- April 30th, 2013, 8:18 am
#428752
Honest question: what is Tebow's record as a starting NFL quarterback?
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
adam42381 wrote:At no point did I ever say Tebow is as good as Roethlisberger. What I did say, is that he wins.jbock13 wrote:Ben Roethlisberger, lets look at him. Never has a pretty stat line, but what does he do? Win. Tell me how successful his career has been? Or was it just luck?Tebow and Roethlisberger? Really? That's a laughable comparison.
DB89 wrote:Honest question: what is Tebow's record as a starting NFL quarterback?15-9. From what I can gather.
SuperJon wrote:RubberMallet wrote:I think it's arrogant to continue to think someone should give you a shot at playing a position that everyone knows you won't be successful at. He had his shot and it didn't work. It's arrogant to think he knows better than anyone else. He's by all accounts an incredible person and Christian but I feel as though this one act is arrogant. I don't say that as an indictment on him, just this situation.SuperJon wrote:For all of the humility that people praise Tebow for, he's being pretty arrogant in refusing to change positions.what? one has nothing to do with the other.
ALUmnus wrote:Or Tebow for that matter
On a side note, Tebow was a money-machine in Denver. How that doesn't make an owner somewhere salivate is beyond me.
LUconn wrote:do we need to go through this again? the defense got back 2 probowl starters and the emergence of von miller almost the exact same time timmy got the job. they went from allowing 20+ pts a game to into low teens. plust we are talking about kyle orton.NotAJerry wrote:DB89 wrote:That's exactly why you don't attribute a team stat to an individual (just like giving wins to pitchers in baseball). Tebow is arguably the worst QB statistically in NFL history to get as much playing time as he did. He's a great leader, but a putrid QB.
not at all, it's just odd that all he has ever done was win, and that hasn't seemed to be good enough.
The run in Denver was fun, and inexplicable on a number of levels, but that's over now and most likely so is Tebow in the NFL.
Except this "team stat" (W-L) has an exact A/B comparison. The B being Orton as the starter. Too much of a sample size to chalk it up to just being inexplicable. I'm also not going to claim some cliche like "he just wins" or something like that but everybody is just too quick to ignore that season. He's not the traditional QB that most would want and I understand why you wouldn't want to build your team around that, but playing unorthodox doesn't mean you can't be successful over the long course of a game. I think he proved that, and really wasn't ever given the chance for that to be proved wrong.
ALUmnus wrote:2. The guy has had three years now to get better. How has he not improved at playing the qb position? I keep hearing about work ethic (which I totally believe he has), but where's the improvement? He's had tons of time and tons of help to get better at throwing the ball. Why hasn't it happened?This is a legitimate question, and one I've been asking myself. Here's what I've come up with so far:
jbock13 wrote:Tebow is 8-6 as a starter.DB89 wrote:Honest question: what is Tebow's record as a starting NFL quarterback?15-9. From what I can gather.
adam42381 wrote:Sorry, I looked it up on my phone and should have double checked it.jbock13 wrote:Tebow is 8-6 as a starter.DB89 wrote:Honest question: what is Tebow's record as a starting NFL quarterback?15-9. From what I can gather.
LUconn wrote:Look at the 2 teams that got to play Tebow a 2nd time.NotAJerry wrote:
That's exactly why you don't attribute a team stat to an individual (just like giving wins to pitchers in baseball). Tebow is arguably the worst QB statistically in NFL history to get as much playing time as he did. He's a great leader, but a putrid QB.
The run in Denver was fun, and inexplicable on a number of levels, but that's over now and most likely so is Tebow in the NFL.
Except this "team stat" (W-L) has an exact A/B comparison. The B being Orton as the starter. Too much of a sample size to chalk it up to just being inexplicable. I'm also not going to claim some cliche like "he just wins" or something like that but everybody is just too quick to ignore that season. He's not the traditional QB that most would want and I understand why you wouldn't want to build your team around that, but playing unorthodox doesn't mean you can't be successful over the long course of a game. I think he proved that, and really wasn't ever given the chance for that to be proved wrong.
adam42381 wrote:9-7 if you include the playoffs.jbock13 wrote:Tebow is 8-6 as a starter.DB89 wrote:Honest question: what is Tebow's record as a starting NFL quarterback?15-9. From what I can gather.
Here's hoping Tim Tebow has developed a taste for women's undergarments ... because TMZ has learned, the teamless QB has just been offered a new job with the "Lingerie" Football League.http://www.tmz.com/2013/04/29/tim-tebow ... ack-coach/
The LFL -- now known as Legends Football League -- sent Tebow's agent a letter moments ago, offering the former Jets QB a swanky new coaching position ... after the Jets fired his jerk this morning.
LFL President Mitchell Mortaza writes, "Now that it appears Mr. Tim Tebow's career in the National Football League may be coming to an end, we at Legends Football League would like to extend him an offer to become our Quarterbacks Coach nationally."
The letter doesn't explain Tim's duties or how much he'd be getting paid ... but it's better than nothing.
Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2013/04/29/tim-tebow ... z2RzrHWeBl
Visit the TMZ Store: http://tmzstore.com
NotAJerry wrote:I think Moon is right about Tebow, but lets look at Moon's first 3 NFL seasons when he was 28-30 and already had 6 years of pro experience in the CFL. 54.4% completions, 40 TD, 59 INT. More INT than TD in each season, completion % dropped each season, and took 134 sacks during his first 3 seasons. He didn't have a QB rating over 80 until his 5th NFL season at age 32. He didn't complete 60% of his passes in a season until he was 33. Moon also had only 1 season of 60% completions in his 6 CFL seasons.Different era. Guys weren't nearly as accurate back then as they are now due to rules changes favoring the offense. You can't fairly evaluate a guy who played before in the 70's or 80's to guys who are active today (I know Moon and Marino played until the 90's/early 2000's). A guy who completed less than 50% of his passes could still keep his job back then. Heck, Joe Namath completed 50.1% for his career and threw 173 TDs to go with 220 INT and a 65.5 QB rating for his career. Now, it doesn't work that way.
If anyone knows about not being a good enough passer for the NFL, it's Warren Moon until he was in his early 30s.