This is the location for conversations that don't fall anywhere else on FlameFans. Whether its politics, culture, the latest techno stuff or just the best places to travel on the web ... this is your forum.

Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke

User avatar
By whmatthews
Registration Days Posts
#78199
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court upheld the nationwide ban on a controversial abortion procedure Wednesday, handing abortion opponents the long- awaited victory they expected from a more conservative bench.

The 5-4 ruling said the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act that Congress passed and President Bush signed into law in 2003 does not violate a woman's constitutional right to an abortion.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id ... _article=1
User avatar
By JDUB
Registration Days Posts
#78214
JF announced it in convo.. said he just got a text message. the whole crowd started laughing when he said he got a text...
User avatar
By qkslvrsrfrboy
Registration Days Posts
#78216
it was funny cuz he didnt say text message, he said "i just received through a texting message, yeah i know, i texting message just like you hooligans do in class"
User avatar
By PAmedic
Registration Days Posts
#78219
I don't know whats funnier- calling it a "texting message" or calling LU kids "hooligans"

FWIW- I don't have text messaging capabilites- nor do I want them. Have never understood the point- ITS A TELEPHONE KIDS! IF YOU NEED TO SPEAK WITH THE PERSON, DIAL THE NUMBER AND TALK TO THEM :dontgetit
By mrich
Registration Days Posts
#78235
PAmedic wrote:I don't know whats funnier- calling it a "texting message" or calling LU kids "hooligans"

FWIW- I don't have text messaging capabilites- nor do I want them. Have never understood the point- ITS A TELEPHONE KIDS! IF YOU NEED TO SPEAK WITH THE PERSON, DIAL THE NUMBER AND TALK TO THEM :dontgetit
Exactly, I hate texting, just call them.
User avatar
By qkslvrsrfrboy
Registration Days Posts
#78244
well sometimes your in class and cant call, or you text say are you in class, if they arent they call you back. or your at a concert and cant hear them.
User avatar
By PAmedic
Registration Days Posts
#78252
qkslvrsrfrboy wrote:well sometimes your in class and cant call, or you text say are you in class, if they arent they call you back. or your at a concert and cant hear them.
and as Chairman of the Board for IBM, its obviously IMPERATIVE that you call the person right back :roll:

I can't even imaging being in college and having a cell phone (of course- they were'nt invented when we :oldhag were there- and I'm not kidding)
no one called you during class because it was not technically possible. Nor did anyone NEED to do so.

anyway- :offtopic I apologize
By BrysOn_G
Registration Days Posts
#78271
i just can't imagine jerry text messaging... at all. he's conforming to the "hooligan" generation! wonder if he's a T9 fan or a traditional "ABC" texter... :lol:
User avatar
By BJWilliams
Registration Days Posts
#78272
Well no matter what his texting preferences are, this is a definite victory for the pro-life crowd. Even with teh laughing about the texting message thing there was plenty of cheering
By thepostman
#78274
To me I don't understand how this is a debatable issue....I mean I do not support abortion at all, but partial birth abortion is terrible....I don't understand how anybody can say, yeah...thats ok...I may not agree with abortion in general, but it seems much more defendable then partial-brith
User avatar
By El Scorcho
Registration Days Posts
#78275
PAmedic wrote:ITS A TELEPHONE KIDS! IF YOU NEED TO SPEAK WITH THE PERSON, DIAL THE NUMBER AND TALK TO THEM :dontgetit
Allow me to explain, my elven friend.

Why do you send people email instead of calling them? That's the same reason people should be sending text messages. Well that, and for service uses. I get weather alerts, bank account balance updates, etc. via text messages on my phone every day. I also get alerts from systems at the school if there are major problems. Are the computers supposed to call me like I'm some kind of 911 dispatcher? "Nick! Ack! Help us! The pain! The horror!"

Additionally, I might want to make someone aware of something without actually having to have a conversation. Let's say I get one of those alerts while I'm at dinner. It's much faster for me to send a quick message to whoever is on duty to say "Check on ____" than it is to call them from the table, or step away from the table.

Sometimes entire phone conversations just aren't necessary.

By the way, if you use a lot of text message/email functions, look into phones with full keyboards whenever you buy your next one. It makes a world of difference when it comes to usability.
User avatar
By El Scorcho
Registration Days Posts
#78277
thepostman wrote:To me I don't understand how this is a debatable issue....I mean I do not support abortion at all, but partial birth abortion is terrible....I don't understand how anybody can say, yeah...thats ok...I may not agree with abortion in general, but it seems much more defendable then partial-brith
Agreed. Every time I think about PBA, I imagine the day my son was born. To think that on that day someone just as easily could have stabbed him before they handed him to me, and that it would have been legal...it makes my heart break and my blood boil.
User avatar
By RubberMallet
Registration Days Posts
#78279
i understand text message...what i didn't understand even though i owned one for 3 years while i was in the landscaping and construction business are the walky talky function of nextel or as i think the company should really be called, Rat Bastard, Inc....

pardon my french
By BrysOn_G
Registration Days Posts
#78287
the walky talky function is effective for on-site work. for example, my dad is a sales rep. when he's on the job site, he just walky-talkies up to the guys putting in glass, as well as other business men involved in the job. saves him from having to make numerous 10-second phone calls to recieve and get a message across. then of course the walky-talky is the normal phone, and text-messaging device (which jerry proved that just about EVERYONE uses!)
By SuperJon
Registration Days Posts
#78291
Me and my mom text each other all the time.

Thanks for the heads up on the full keyboard. I sometimes send as many as 50-60 texts a day (I rarely ever call people unless they don't have text messaging and I'm forced to) so that could work.
User avatar
By RubberMallet
Registration Days Posts
#78294
BrysOn_G wrote:the walky talky function is effective for on-site work. for example, my dad is a sales rep. when he's on the job site, he just walky-talkies up to the guys putting in glass, as well as other business men involved in the job. saves him from having to make numerous 10-second phone calls to recieve and get a message across. then of course the walky-talky is the normal phone, and text-messaging device (which jerry proved that just about EVERYONE uses!)
but think about it....i understand what you are saying but by the time its all said and done asking the question, getting the answer, asking another question, getting an answer, then saying bye, you've already been goofing around with it you've already got a minute invested
By BrysOn_G
Registration Days Posts
#78299
yeah, i'm with you on that one. i've got no use for it. however, i will admit i'm a texter. but usually just during times i couldn't make a phone call. i.e. class, class, and class.

the walky-talky probably was a little over the top. i'm sure it's especially helpful to someone somewhere.
By LUconn
Registration Days Posts
#78303
man, from baby killing to walkietalkie phones all before page 2. Impressive :checkeredflag
User avatar
By JDUB
Registration Days Posts
#78347
well, my .02 about texting... its great for settings in which you can't make a call, which is most of the time every day for me. class, work, church, convo. then you have places to loud: bus, ball games, other random loud places. also good to use so you can avoid long winded poeple
By 4everfsu
Registration Days Posts
#78354
This thread has been hijacked, lets get back to PBA. Finally the good guys won for once.
User avatar
By El Scorcho
Registration Days Posts
#78363
I'm still amazed that there's a negative reaction to this from anyone, but all over the web people are acting like this is somehow a horrible thing. I don't get it.
User avatar
By qkslvrsrfrboy
Registration Days Posts
#78372
because now women dont have complete free choice, which is rediculous. No one is making them have sex, theres there choice. People in this country do not know how to deal with consequences, whether it be little consequences like not cutting you hair and getting reps, to drinking every night and losing your job, which could lead to more consequences in that you could become homeless and lose your family, to getting pregnant and placing the blame on someone else and passing the consequences to the baby. If there is any law that deals with consequences, Liberals want it gone. We shouldnt get a slap on the wrist for anything, we should simply be told no, because apparently this nation is full of morons that are 3 years old, want everything hand fed to them without doing a single thing, and if they mess up its no problem.
By Realist
Registration Days Posts
#78375
PAmedic wrote:I don't know whats funnier- calling it a "texting message" or calling LU kids "hooligans"

FWIW- I don't have text messaging capabilites- nor do I want them. Have never understood the point- ITS A TELEPHONE KIDS! IF YOU NEED TO SPEAK WITH THE PERSON, DIAL THE NUMBER AND TALK TO THEM :dontgetit

We're also forgetting that it's a valuable tool if you are single and trying to figure out which ladies are out and doing what on certain nights, without actually having to make a phone call and commit to one. Very very valuable.*


*Not that I would know about this since I have a fiance now.
By LUconn
Registration Days Posts
#78464
I was just reading some articles and thought I'd gather some information (which I'm sure we've all heard at one point or another) and present it to the class:
The procedure is usually performed during the fifth month of gestation or later. The woman's cervix is dilated, and the fetus is partially removed from the womb, feet first. The surgeon inserts a sharp object into the back of the fetus' head, removes it, and inserts a vacuum tube through which the brains are extracted. The head of the fetus contracts at this point and allows the fetus to be more easily removed from the womb.
Hillary Clinton wrote:This decision marks a dramatic departure from four decades of Supreme Court rulings that upheld a woman's right to choose and recognized the importance of women's health. Today's decision blatantly defies the Court's recent decision in 2000 striking down a state partial-birth abortion law because of its failure to provide an exception for the health of the mother. As the Supreme Court recognized in Roe v. Wade in 1973, this issue is complex and highly personal; the rights and lives of women must be taken into account. It is precisely this erosion of our constitutional rights that I warned against when I opposed the nominations of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito
Barack Obama wrote: I strongly disagree with today’s Supreme Court ruling, which dramatically departs from previous precedents safeguarding the health of pregnant women. As Justice Ginsburg emphasized in her dissenting opinion, this ruling signals an alarming willingness on the part of the conservative majority to disregard its prior rulings respecting a woman’s medical concerns and the very personal decisions between a doctor and patient. I am extremely concerned that this ruling will embolden state legislatures to enact further measures to restrict a woman's right to choose, and that the conservative Supreme Court justices will look for other opportunities to erode Roe v. Wade, which is established federal law and a matter of equal rights for women.
John Edwards wrote:I could not disagree more strongly with today's Supreme Court decision. The ban upheld by the Court is an ill-considered and sweeping prohibition that does not even take account for serious threats to the health of individual women. This hard right turn is a stark reminder of why Democrats cannot afford to lose the 2008 election. Too much is at stake - starting with, as the Court made all too clear today, a woman's right to choose
I'm willing to say that these 3 are evil.
By BrysOn_G
Registration Days Posts
#78468
i can't stand john edwards. i wrote him a letter one time concerning something he said about my blue devils. it was very professional, kind-hearted, and well written. nothing to make him angry, just simply asking him a question. he sent me back a letter that was snobby and very unprofessional.

jerk. i'd say he's evil too... especially after reading how partial abortion is performed.
Bowling Green

We need to play more physical. Lost that with JSU […]

Charlie Kirk

But all the comments are that he wasn't a leftist.[…]

The poor guy didn’t make it very long. :)

Defensive Woes

Do we really have co-defensive coordinators? […]