Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
ballah09 wrote: ↑March 21st, 2025, 11:23 pm I mean he’s not wrong. We’re not long tall, long and athletic enough to defend their much taller and athletic guards and forwards.Rushed. Not in rhythm. Credit to Oregon for that.
The one way we can beat them is not working tonight, the threes. We’re getting good looks but it’s the wrong night to be off.
ECC29 wrote: ↑March 21st, 2025, 11:18 pmI love facts. And you’re spot on.JK37 wrote: ↑March 21st, 2025, 10:55 pmStating facts. You don’t like facts?ECC29 wrote: ↑March 21st, 2025, 10:40 pm Not skillful enough and not athletic enough.Knew it wouldn’t take you long
Ill flame wrote: ↑March 21st, 2025, 11:33 pm It’s unfortunate this game is playing out how it is but this is an Oregon team that was ranked in the top 10 at one point before having a bad month from late January into early February. They then figured it out again and won 8 of their last 9 games in the big ten. This isn’t your ordinary 5 seed. And again, we had to travel 2k+ miles for a 10:26pm tip off. We can downplay it all we want but these things matter.The first half of what you said matters a whole lot more than the second half. Oregon is just freakin good.
JK37 wrote: ↑March 21st, 2025, 10:55 pmHe's not lying though. Seems like folks here are comfortable with just making a tourney but not progressing in the tourney each season. The old way of building a program is over with, yet some folks cling on to that ideology and hoping for a different result. Some folks might call that insanity.ECC29 wrote: ↑March 21st, 2025, 10:40 pm Not skillful enough and not athletic enough.Knew it wouldn’t take you long
cruzan_flame13 wrote: ↑March 21st, 2025, 11:58 pmHe is correct.JK37 wrote: ↑March 21st, 2025, 10:55 pmHe's not lying though. Seems like folks here are comfortable with just making a tourney but not progressing in the tourney each season. The old way of building a program is over with, yet some folks cling on to that ideology and hoping for a different result. Some folks might call that insanity.ECC29 wrote: ↑March 21st, 2025, 10:40 pm Not skillful enough and not athletic enough.Knew it wouldn’t take you long
JK37 wrote: ↑March 22nd, 2025, 12:15 amStill trying to figure out where he said that in this thread in regard to RMK.cruzan_flame13 wrote: ↑March 21st, 2025, 11:58 pmHe is correct.JK37 wrote: ↑March 21st, 2025, 10:55 pmHe's not lying though. Seems like folks here are comfortable with just making a tourney but not progressing in the tourney each season. The old way of building a program is over with, yet some folks cling on to that ideology and hoping for a different result. Some folks might call that insanity.
Knew it wouldn’t take you long
No one here is comfortable with the status quo.
The game has indeed changed.
No one here is clinging to the old.
This program is trending upwards.
Just won reg season and tourney in the toughest conference of which it’s ever been a member.
This staff has shown a total willingness to adapt.
To suggest changing the head coach is necessary to continue this upward trajectory is ignorant and smacks of agenda or ulterior motive.
cruzan_flame13 wrote: ↑March 22nd, 2025, 12:38 amYou’re around here a lot, and you’re very smart. Certainly much smarter than this. You can figure it out. Intentionally obtuse is not a good look, especially for an intelligent person like you.JK37 wrote: ↑March 22nd, 2025, 12:23 amHe didn’t.Then why make that statement?Gotta love the internet man
![]()
JK37 wrote: ↑March 22nd, 2025, 12:43 amI just think it's funny how folks pick and choose what is obtuse or wrong when it doesn't fit their bias opinion. As Arthur Schopenhauer puts it (allegedly), "What the herd hates most is the one whocruzan_flame13 wrote: ↑March 22nd, 2025, 12:38 amYou’re around here a lot, and you’re very smart. Certainly much smarter than this. You can figure it out. Intentionally obtuse is not a good look, especially for an intelligent person like you.JK37 wrote: ↑March 22nd, 2025, 12:23 amHe didn’t.Then why make that statement?Gotta love the internet man
![]()