Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke, Class of 20Something

BJWilliams wrote:Liberty won't (nor has to really) post the exact number for the buyout, but it would have to be a significant number, since this wasn't the first time they tried to postpone/get out of the game... someone want to find out?
Sly Fox wrote:Last I heard there was no buyout for the September game. Instead we are getting a home game at a later date.Let's not hold our breath for that one. They're going to keep putting it off and putting it off until they have to pay us. They're not coming back to Lynchburg.
phoenix wrote:I agree! That sorta deal smells like hot trash. It actually sounds like we're trying to be kind up front, for a deal on the back end ..... Hahahaha... are they giving us some sorta sunbelt presidents free massage(will tell the sunbelt school presidents we like you guys cut us a break. Since clearly they're all in love with JMU) ??Sly Fox wrote:Last I heard there was no buyout for the September game. Instead we are getting a home game at a later date.Let's not hold our breath for that one. They're going to keep putting it off and putting it off until they have to pay us. They're not coming back to Lynchburg.
jlread wrote:The massage will not have a happy ending......phoenix wrote:I agree! That sorta deal smells like hot trash. It actually sounds like we're trying to be kind up front, for a deal on the back end ..... Hahahaha... are they giving us some sorta sunbelt presidents free massage(will tell the sunbelt school presidents we like you guys cut us a break. Since clearly they're all in love with JMU) ??Sly Fox wrote:Last I heard there was no buyout for the September game. Instead we are getting a home game at a later date.Let's not hold our breath for that one. They're going to keep putting it off and putting it off until they have to pay us. They're not coming back to Lynchburg.
alabama24 wrote:I dont understand the whole "promise for a future game" thing. Take the money out of principle .Especially if its JMU and their fan base is already upset about the ammount of money we have cost them this fiscal year.


BJWilliams wrote:its an attempt to save what little face they have either way.No, it's not.
BJWilliams wrote:its an attempt to save what little face they have either way. They lost to us in their place and barely beat us on their last 2 trips to our place.So again. Take. The. Money.
BuryYourDuke wrote:JMU took a lot of heat for that playoff bid, they would have taken more for an expensive buyout. I think it was in their best interest to promise a future game that will probably never happen. Six figures doesn't mean anything to us these days so we went with it.To the school as a whole, no it's not a lot. However, to JB & Co., I believe it's probably a good little portion, especially considering the way the money can be used being that it was earned by the Athletics department and not given to them as a subsidy.
ballcoach15 wrote:I have no love for JMU, whether we beat them or lose to them. I am glad we are not playing them. LU should ignore that JMU even exists.By your logic Alabama and Auburn should never play. Duke and UNC should never play. Basically, no rivalry game should be played
ballcoach15 wrote:I have no love for JMU, whether we beat them or lose to them. I am glad we are not playing them. LU should ignore that JMU even exists.

