- January 2nd, 2013, 7:53 pm
#416532
Certainly we have the best facilities for a team that has never been to a playoff game right?
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke, Class of 20Something
givemethemic wrote:Certainly we have the best facilities for a team that has never been to a playoff game right?I think this is your best post ever
givemethemic wrote:Certainly we have the best facilities for a team that has never been to a playoff game right?Too bad this wasn't 3 days ago it would have been post of the year. It is the front leader for 2013!
logic wrote:You guys are missing one.
Could it be that we need more lockers if we're going FBS? FBS rosters are usually a little bigger, and maybe the FOC was initially built with less lockers than a full FBS roster?
forbidden wrote:wouldnt expanding the stadium (for whatever reasons) bring in more money
logic wrote:Squad limit of 105 for FBS and 90 for FCS? Are those limits still in place? How many lockers did the FOC have?over 110. you forget guys that most big FCS teams carry upwards of 115 players in their locker rooms because of scout team players. they are just getting nicer lockers with a better layout.
BJWilliams wrote:To underscore Sly's point, when I went to Oklahoma to visit my wife (my girlfriend at the time), we got to watch OU practice for a bit and theywere practicing on two fields opposite the stadium so that makes sense to have turf fields and not use the stadium field except for gamedayI was at South Carolina last year for a show at their stadium's The Zone venue and the only people I saw practicing in the actually stadium were the kickers. Punters and kickers. I was there two days and both days they came in and kicked for about an hour. The rest of the team was across the street on what appeared to be two or three practice fields. I believe their stadium was natural grass so maybe that played a role.
ProudLUAlum wrote:I think it is a simple matter that LU wants to be viewed as upward bound. Therefore, if the football team is only so-so and the basketball team SUCKS, we cant show progress in terms of championships or playoff appearances...so we will show progress through facilities. If the teams would just WIN...we wouldnt have to spend so much $$$$Facilities have a lot more to do with moving up than a win/loss record. Therefore, if your football team is only so-so but you have great facilities, people walk away saying that the University is committed to this. If you have a good football team and crappy facilities, people walk away saying their football team is good but just how committed are they if they aren't going to put the resources into the program?