From multiple angles, I think I can speak to this. So, alright, I'll take a crack at it.
Naysayer1234 wrote:Lets be objective here.
College Basketball is a business. Christian or Non-Christian.
If you don't produce then you get fired
Food for further thought and commmentary: Does it
have to be a business? Is it
only a business? Can you adequately define "production" as you're using it here? And remember, this is an intercollegiate program based at an educational institution. In that context, production cannot be only one element, and it's many elements cannot ever be mutully exclusive.
Naysayer1234 wrote:...get the program back to where it was in 2003-05.
03-05 is FAR from the program's highest standard. In some ways, it bordered upon its lowest. So, let's not be brash.
Naysayer1234 wrote:Be a professional, cut him loose and send him on his way.
Cutting him loose in and of itself is not inherently professional in this case.
How he is cut loose (if/when he is) is the key to professionalism and Christian testimony.
Naysayer1234 wrote:I care more for the program than the coaching staff
This almost renders nearly everything you said prior and after irrelevant to me. Generally speaking, coaches of this nature and in the environment of which we are speaking do understand the life they've chosen when they enter this particular vocation. But they are still fathers/mothers with families, children, etc. To cut such people loose
solely on the basis of winning and losing is wrong. However, I grant you, both winning and losing - especially prolonged periods of either - are often byproducts of other things. For this reason, a careful examination of the program
at season's end is certainly warranted.
Naysayer1234 wrote:indirectly supporting a failing product is madness.
I want to address this, but I cannot do so properly until you adequately define production/success as you use it. Please take time to do so. And define what production and success is; don't disingenuously take the lazy route and simply tell me what it is not.
If, as you admit with your original verbiage, the program was in bad sorts when it was taken over by the current Head Coach, are you saying less than four seasons is adequate time to return it to a level befitting your expectations? If so, I disagree. For my alma mater, I do not wish for flash-in-the-pan, lightning-in-a-bottle quick success. So, I will be patient.
Naysayer1234 wrote:We deserve better, you deserve better, Liberty deserves better, and the alumni deserve better.
What gives you the right to "deserve" anything? I'm genuinely asking what you've done to believe you have a right to feel entitled to such an opinion?
One of the wisest men I've ever known taught me the principle, "One is only entitled to an opinion if one can defend it." You have work left to do.
Naysayer1234 wrote:Get someone who will buy in to what Liberty is all about...
As a man, you will be hard-pressed to find anyone who more intuitively and passionately understands and buys into what Liberty is all about than Dale Layer. What would you say Liberty is all about? And what experiences of your own give you the right to claim that Dale Layer has not bought into "what Liberty is all about"?
My responses are genuine. My perspective is valid, I assure you. If you and/or others are game, then sure, let's have this conversation.