lynchburgwildcats wrote:Purple Haize wrote:Looks like Karl got slapped on the hand for his handling of the situation.
LYNCH - you should be suprised. What you think is 'missed' actually isn't missed. You should try it sometime!
Oh no, I've watched hundreds of hours of game film in my day. A lot is still missed. In fact, last game I watched on film I saw 15 illegal screen by one team in the first half and they were only whistled for one.
How much film is an official able to watch in-the-moment just prior to making a judgment call? How many replays does an official get to see between seeing a play live the first time, and the average of 1.2 secs before a decision has to be made on a judgment call? To compare your film study from a coaching perspective (obvious bias) to the judgment call of a basketball referee (withot bias) is to be truly ignorant of what the job entails.
To dwell on the fact that protocol was not followed is to ignore that the ACC hasn't officially addressed the policy with it's officials for some time. This situation also becomes more convoluted when one considers that a conference protocol wasn't followed, but officials such Hess work for multiple conferences, each with it's own policies.
Finally, every single person in this thread who has claimed "worst official" is displaying a clear fan or coach bias to the specific situation(s). It must be pointed out that all conferences are extremely careful to allow officials to comment at all publicly, so there will be no "owning up" in this case or any future one.