- September 30th, 2011, 3:53 pm
#359501
It's scary but I think I actually DO get his point. The problem is not everyone agrees with the premise that we lowered admission standards for athletes. Im not sure I agree with that either because we have in practice , if not theory, an open admissions policy. If you can pay, or at least show good faith of payment, come on in.
The other problem is people disagree as to why Asa was put back on the team.
Therefore, if I may speak to ff2e point, he or she feels that it was a football decision based on the assumption that our football team would be better and win games. By not winning the game he played in( he only played in one and tomorrow doesn't really count) and if we don't win out then this was a bad decision both from the University's integrity AND from the football stand point.
Unlike me, they feel that even IF this reinstatement results in more victories on the football field, the cost to the University's integrity was too great.
Potentate of The Dark Side
Aspiring Upward Basketball Coach
Suck on my Funk and Wagnalls! - Unknown