[BJWilliams]

I saw this article and I about wanted to throw something:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4871697

[SuperJon]

I saw this rticleadn I about wanted to throw something:

I'm quoting this just so that you can't edit it. That has to be your biggest spelling error ever, and that's saying quite a bit.

[Sly Fox]

Somewhere GMTM is impressed.

[BJWilliams]

yeah...I was writing it on my new netbook...not used to the keys being so close together (and I edited it anyway SJ...so there)

[El Scorcho]

yeah...I was writing it on my new netbook...not used to the keys being so close together

But netbooks are the awesomesauce?

[BJWilliams]

Theyre alright...again it takes some getting used to for me.

[RubberMallet]

who dat is one of the most mentally retarded things i've ever heard. so....good.

[Sly Fox]

Who Dat is legitimate language for Cajuns. Stevev will back me up from his Lake Charles days. Waterboy wasn't as much of a parody of the culture as you might think.

[RubberMallet]

proves my point thank you

[ALUmnus]

who dat is one of the most mentally retarded things i've ever heard. so....good.

who dey

[givemethemic]

Somewhere GMTM is impressed.

[01LUGrad]

The NFL decided not to sue.

Initially, the NFL said shop owners would have to pay for the right to sell Who Dat stuff. But now it seems the NFL has backed off the position, saying they don't own the right to "Who Dat" when it's by itself. The issue is when the phrase is paired with an NFL or Saints logo.

http://www.wdsu.com/sports/22404613/detail.html?hpt=T2

[blwall1416]

who dat is one of the most mentally retarded things i've ever heard.

This.