Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
PAmedic wrote:you're absolutely right
Sly Fox wrote:I simply cannot figure out the "Oh-anything". Did you call 1910 "Nine-Ten"?I wasn't alive back then, but I'm sure you can remember it fondly along with walking 10 miles to school in 3 feet of snow barefoot uphill both ways
PAmedic wrote:you're absolutely right
ATrain wrote:Sounds like my parents stories about going to school in Michigan... had to have been terribleSly Fox wrote:I simply cannot figure out the "Oh-anything". Did you call 1910 "Nine-Ten"?I wasn't alive back then, but I'm sure you can remember it fondly along with walking 10 miles to school in 3 feet of snow barefoot uphill both ways
LUnpretty11 wrote:PH, your BJ skills impress me.
adam42381 wrote:If you're going with 0-10, then did you call this year 0-09? Doesn't make sense. I'll probably use 20-10.Most people have been referencing things as "oh-four oh-five oh-six" etc so that's where the "oh-ten" comes from.
kel varson wrote:Ditto, Sly, don't get the 'o' 10.I don't get it either. It's like Saying 9 O 17 pm because your normally say 9 O 7 pm. It just sounds dumb to me.
flamesbball84 wrote:EXACTLY.kel varson wrote:Ditto, Sly, don't get the 'o' 10.I don't get it either. It's like Saying 9 O 17 pm because your normally say 9 O 7 pm. It just sounds dumb to me.
LUnpretty11 wrote:PH, your BJ skills impress me.
flamesbball84 wrote:kel varson wrote:Ditto, Sly, don't get the 'o' 10.I don't get it either. It's like Saying 9 O 17 pm because your normally say 9 O 7 pm. It just sounds dumb to me.
PAmedic wrote:you're absolutely right
ATrain wrote:So was 1910 known as 9-10? It's the same logic and doesn't make since either.flamesbball84 wrote:kel varson wrote:Ditto, Sly, don't get the 'o' 10.I don't get it either. It's like Saying 9 O 17 pm because your normally say 9 O 7 pm. It just sounds dumb to me.
The obvious problem with your logic here is there is no 0 in front of the 17 and after the nine. There is a 0 between the 2 and the 10.
LUnpretty11 wrote:PH, your BJ skills impress me.
El Scorcho wrote: they might get a throat punch.What like this?
El Scorcho wrote:post at your own risk.
El Scorcho wrote:"Twenty-ten" or "two thousand and ten" will both work for me. If someone gives me any of that "Oh ten" crap, they might get a throat punch. That's dumb.It isn't if you live by the Gregorian calendar, which I think it's a pretty safe thing to assume.
About as dumb as people arguing that 2009 isn't the end of a decade.
flamesbball84 wrote:As I said in the other thread on here, that's pedantic. In modern times most (normal) people group decades from 0-9.El Scorcho wrote:"Twenty-ten" or "two thousand and ten" will both work for me. If someone gives me any of that "Oh ten" crap, they might get a throat punch. That's dumb.It isn't if you live by the Gregorian calendar, which I think it's a pretty safe thing to assume.
About as dumb as people arguing that 2009 isn't the end of a decade.
I hate you Merry Christmas :D :lol: May[…]