coolhandluke wrote:
First of all you misspelled his last name.
Sorry, (although I'm unsure why it matters)
Secondly, you can talk all the crap you want about the Big South and how it is holding Liberty back. But saying Liberty "isn't a place were pro athletes come to play. We see one or two in each sport every decade or so, but if you have talent and serious aspirations of becoming pro, Liberty isn't a good choice" is just bad taste man. If you call yourself a true Liberty fan you would never say that.
C'mon, let's be realistic. Unfortunately I have a bitter taste in my mouth toward Liberty "homers". My first year at Liberty, we went to the NCAA tourney and played North Carolina. We kept up with the #1 seed well into the second half, we played a GREAT game. I remember returning from spring break and hearing the guys next door to me talking about how Liberty would be a LEGIT final four team in 4-5 years. Basing it all off the NC game. I joked back thinking they were kidding, they were not. Being a true fan doesn't mean sticking your head in the sand and acting like what I said is not true.
Yes, it may be true that most of our athletes do not go pro. But its that way at most colleges. In a very rare case an entire starting five goes pro (example: UNC's five from '04 I believe). But in most cases only one, maybe two players from a very good team will make it in the NBA.
Of course it is like that in most colleges, there are 300+ (I think) D-I schools. The Big South plays in a conference that might see 1-2 players in each sport go professional every decade or so. If he goes to the ACC, he will play against an NBA player (or more), just about EVERY league game. He will also most likely play with an NBA player.
Lastly, how can you understand him jumping ship? It would be like applying for a job at Starbucks and being turned down, then going to work at a little coffee shop that no one has ever heard of and quickly becoming the manager there and running the show. Then all of the sudden Starbucks come knocking at your door offering you the job you originally applied for.
TERRIBLE analogy. It would be like leaving Liberty Law school for Harvard Law. BIG difference, and it makes sense to me!
So basically, it is insulting to Seth to go to one of the schools that had nothing to do with him just a little over a year ago.
Insulting to whom? I love Liberty, but c'mon, we are in the bottom third of Division I schools. The problem is the Big South. IMO, there will NEVER be an "at large" bid out of the Big South. That, to me, says volumes about the conference. Maybe one day I'll be proved wrong, but today's reality says that I'm right.
But Seth can just go ahead and get involved in the corporate infrastructure of "Starbucks" where he will never become the manager like he was here at Liberty.
But which one looks better on a resume? Being an average employee at Starbucks for 3 years or being the manager at a different coffeeshop for 4?
I say he had a better shot at going pro in the situation he had here. He was going to get his 20 a game here. At an ACC school he is not going to get that. He will be the 3rd or 4th option on his team and will be lucky to average 10 a game. And he's not going to make the NBA as a shooting guard averaging 10 points a game...
I've got a feeling that he feels differently. Lot's of critics like to say what others can't do, I think he would LOVE nothing better than to prove you wrong.