result: NO.
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
JLFJR wrote:Thanks for your input, PA! Very helpful.
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
LUconn wrote:Wouldn't both of those TVs be showing the same channel?nope. they are dual tuners, so you can watch a different thing on two different TVs connected to the same box. we do it all the time with the box my tv is connected to.
TDDance234 wrote:Leasing a second receiver is only $5.99 a month for DTv. Or, you could just run a splitter to your second TV. It's not that hard to get around.we have five TVs: basement, kitchen/dining room, living room, and two bedrooms. we have one of the connections split to the basement one because its not used enough to warrant paying for another receiver just for that tv. if we had directv, we'd have to get 4-5 tuners to get the same kind of experience, with dish we have two. plus the package is cheaper than the equivalent on directv.
flamesbball84 wrote:No I have Dish. I know about their magic 2 TV box. I'm talking about TDD's splitting idea.LUconn wrote:Wouldn't both of those TVs be showing the same channel?nope. they are dual tuners, so you can watch a different thing on two different TVs connected to the same box. we do it all the time with the box my tv is connected to.
LUconn wrote:oh ok, i didn't know which one you were referring to, my bad. yeah his idea would show the same channel unless he was really crafty and was able to change the firmware and stuff on his receiver...flamesbball84 wrote:No I have Dish. I know about their magic 2 TV box. I'm talking about TDD's splitting idea.LUconn wrote:Wouldn't both of those TVs be showing the same channel?nope. they are dual tuners, so you can watch a different thing on two different TVs connected to the same box. we do it all the time with the box my tv is connected to.
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.

Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
Hold My Own wrote:wasnt there a billion dollar law suit involving Comcast and Fiber optics?there always seems to be a lawsuit involving comcast. I think Lynchburg just decides that it's cable company shuold be some comapny always getting into legal and litigation trouble.
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
Sly Fox wrote:That would actually be Verizon FIOS. But by the time they lay fiber nobody knows who will own the lines. It changes regularly here in Texas. My dad is waiting for Verizon to drop fiber at his place and he lives two blocks off a freeway. So there is no rhyme or rhythm to their thinking.Shoot, that's what I meant. I was trying to come up with a competitor for AT&T and I came up with Comcast.