mrmacphisto wrote:For traveling cross-country, AT&T holds its own against Verizon. Sprint is a distant third. I had Sprint in 2001/02 and hated it. Dropped calls, roaming charges, etc. I've no complaints about AT&T, except that I lose service between Amherst and North Garden on Route 29. Verizon wins there.
i've had different experiences....the past 3 years i've traveled all over the country with work....90% of the time with a cohort who had att.
when i had sprint he would have coverage when i would not....however since i've been with verizon we together have been to
northern arkansas, rural wisconsin, rural minnesota, rural kansas, rural oklahoma, and drove through texas. we've also been driving through indiana and michigan. i have had more coverage than him usually all the time... it drives him nuts...because he tried to get me to go to att. and i didn't because i told him i didn't think the coverage was as good...and he hates being wrong...
but those experiences are pretty much midwest experiences....i had sprint 6 years ago in lynchburg and it was probably the worst service/coverage i'd ever received...
Formerly ishbox.
<--idiot, i guess, per bigsmooth/thepostman
<--smart jerk per bigsmooth
SuperJon wrote: I love dc Talk.