If you want to talk ASUN smack or ramble ad nauseum about your favorite pro or major college teams, this is the place to let it rip.

Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke

Who will win the Heisman Trophy?

Tim Tebag
17
53%
Darren Mc Fadden
9
28%
Colt Brennan
2
6%
Dennis Dixon
No votes
0%
Other
4
13%
User avatar
By RubberMallet
Registration Days Posts
#135389
darren mcfadden probably will. glenn dorsey deserves it.
User avatar
By Fumblerooskies
Registration Days Posts
#135395
Tebow SHOULD win it...
...got my vote but he won't win b/c he's a soph.
User avatar
By jcmanson
Registration Days Posts
#135405
I think McFadden should win it, but Tebow probably will.
User avatar
By PAmedic
Registration Days Posts
#135478
OTHER

(PAmedic, reserve kicker-resident hottie)
By jmdickens
Registration Days Posts
#135501
It doesn't really matter.....

Tebow has done better in college, and McFadden will play and make more in the pros!!! Does anyone else think of him as a twin of Adrian Peterson??
By Rocketfan
Registration Days Posts
#135544
Who will win and who should win are 2 different votes for me.
By thepostman
#135559
Kevin Smith....

oh i mean...McFadden will probably win it...
By vastrightwinger
Registration Days Posts
#135662
I agree that smith at least deserves a look, but i don't think he will get it. Anyone who is on the verge of breaking the single season rushing record at least deserves to be considered.
By LUconn
Registration Days Posts
#135669
Listening to somebdoy filling in for Cowherd yesterday mentioned a voter he was talking to voted for Smith #1 and then Tebow #2. So he's getting recognition, but won't win it obviously.
User avatar
By ToTheLeft
Registration Days Posts
#135676
jmdickens wrote:It doesn't really matter.....

Tebow has done better in college, and McFadden will play and make more in the pros!!! Does anyone else think of him as a twin of Adrian Peterson??
honestly, no.

less explosive, less injury prone, fumbles more (poor carrying technique)

he will be good, but i think hes more of a tiki barber.
User avatar
By ToTheLeft
Registration Days Posts
#135677
LUconn wrote:Listening to somebdoy filling in for Cowherd yesterday mentioned a voter he was talking to voted for Smith #1 and then Tebow #2. So he's getting recognition, but won't win it obviously.
Smith?
By LUconn
Registration Days Posts
#135683
Kevin Smith
By vastrightwinger
Registration Days Posts
#135684
He is University of Central Florida's running Back. He is 181 yards short of breaking Barry Sanders' single season rushing record with one game to play.
User avatar
By prototype
Registration Days Posts
#135687
Kevin Smith has about much chance to win the Heisman as I have to win a MVP trophy in the SuperBowl.

Should be McFadden, but Tebow could get it, but then again a underclassman has never won it.
By belcherboy
Registration Days Posts
#135815
prototype wrote:Kevin Smith has about much chance to win the Heisman as I have to win a MVP trophy in the SuperBowl.

Should be McFadden, but Tebow could get it, but then again a underclassman has never won it.
Really? Only Seniors have won it? That isn't right, I'm certain there have been several underclassmen that have won it in the past. I'll look them up.


Here are the underclassmen over that past 25 years who have won the heisman:

1982 Herschel Walker Georgia RB Jr.
1988 Barry Sanders Oklahoma State RB Jr.
1989 Andre Ware Houston QB Jr.
1990 Ty Detmer Brigham Young QB Jr.
1991 Desmond Howard Michigan WR Jr.
1994 Rashaan Salaam Colorado RB Jr.
1997 Charles Woodson Michigan CB Jr.
2003 Jason White Oklahoma QB Jr.
2004 Matt Leinart USC QB Jr.
2005 Reggie Bush USC RB Jr.

If you meant by underclassmen sophomore or younger, you are correct. I was under the impression that underclassmen meant anyone but a senior, is my definition wrong?
Last edited by belcherboy on December 6th, 2007, 12:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
By SuperJon
Registration Days Posts
#135818
Reggie Bush won it as a junior.


So did Leinart.
By JK37
Registration Days Posts
#135821
by technical definition, an underclasman is a sophomore or freshman. Juniors and seniors, at least by the national media's measure, are considered uppperclasmmen. That's why they're saying it that way.
By SuperJon
Registration Days Posts
#135822
Oh, I was just going on the "only seniors" thing that belcherboy said.
By belcherboy
Registration Days Posts
#135824
JK37 wrote:by technical definition, an underclasman is a sophomore or freshman. Juniors and seniors, at least by the national media's measure, are considered uppperclasmmen. That's why they're saying it that way.
That makes sense than. For some reason I always thought an underclassmen was anyone who isn't a senior.
By thepostman
#135835
Kevin Smith really should be a finalist....he has the second most yards ever for a running back in a single season yet doesn't become a finalist?? maybe its my central florida bias though, who knows
By jmdickens
Registration Days Posts
#135839
yeah...it's your bias

look at his competition....then look at those who won the heisman and their competition...2 different levels
By thepostman
#135849
jmdickens wrote:yeah...it's your bias

look at his competition....then look at those who won the heisman and their competition...2 different levels
then why is brennan there?? they play a much worse schedule and they pass 60 times a game....oh well, kevin smith will be making more money in the future then brennan anyways...
5 for 5 rule Meeting

Ohio just granted an injunction to 15 kids with mo[…]