Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
SuperJon wrote: I love dc Talk.
jmdickens wrote:It doesn't really matter.....honestly, no.
Tebow has done better in college, and McFadden will play and make more in the pros!!! Does anyone else think of him as a twin of Adrian Peterson??
LUconn wrote:Listening to somebdoy filling in for Cowherd yesterday mentioned a voter he was talking to voted for Smith #1 and then Tebow #2. So he's getting recognition, but won't win it obviously.Smith?
prototype wrote:Kevin Smith has about much chance to win the Heisman as I have to win a MVP trophy in the SuperBowl.Really? Only Seniors have won it? That isn't right, I'm certain there have been several underclassmen that have won it in the past. I'll look them up.
Should be McFadden, but Tebow could get it, but then again a underclassman has never won it.
JK37 wrote:by technical definition, an underclasman is a sophomore or freshman. Juniors and seniors, at least by the national media's measure, are considered uppperclasmmen. That's why they're saying it that way.That makes sense than. For some reason I always thought an underclassmen was anyone who isn't a senior.
jmdickens wrote:yeah...it's your biasthen why is brennan there?? they play a much worse schedule and they pass 60 times a game....oh well, kevin smith will be making more money in the future then brennan anyways...
look at his competition....then look at those who won the heisman and their competition...2 different levels