- April 23rd, 2006, 12:13 pm
#12885
Well my eye sight isn't what it used to be. The discussion regarding the locker rooms involved the CURRENT locker room, not the NEW one. I stand/sit/slouch corrected
As for the other posts, I don't feel I am off the mark. The practice fields still are over by Hancock etc and can get pretty nasty. As for whether the weather (How is THAT for spelling genius!) is a factor, look at all the D1 schools that have an indoor practice facility. FSU, U of F and Miami have pretty nice weather, yet have the indoor practice facility. So do the west coast schools. It is a nice recruiting piece, and if we are doing this thing why not do it right? What a HUGE advantage it would be to have this nice indoor facility when very few other 1AA programs do. Plus with our D1A aspiriations, it would ALREADY BE IN PLACE. Planning Planning Planning!!
I am VERY thankful, and even SHOCKED that we are going to the new Turf. Very SMART move. I will give credit where credit is due.
TALLY I am not ripping the university "just because I can". I am pointing out that it looks like another case of "here we go again". Why should we "just be grateful" (STEVEV) for what the university is doing? Why do I get criticized (not that I mind!) for DEMANDING excellence?? I don't just want to say, "Oh the practice fields can go wherever there is room" b/c that is the problem we have now! I would like to see somet hought into drainage, proximity etc to the facility we have. Is that so "evil"? I am not ripping, just asking!! Now if you want me to rip............
If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure. - GWB