Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
kentuckywildcats wrote:i am not shuk, i don't even know who that is.OK, I don't claim to be an expert, so if I'm wrong, correct me. Release from what?!!!! He doesn't have a scholarship. As far as I know he can talk to anyone he wants to. Even if what you are saying is true, do you honestly think RMc would refuse to release him to go somewhere he can get a scholarship which we wouldn't offer him? I think not!
also, for ohman to get a scholarship elsewhere or even have another school be able to legally talk to him, he would have to get his athletic release from Liberty, which means McKay would have to approve of it.
olldflame wrote:you still have to get an ATHLETIC, not scholarship, release because it's illegal for an ncaa coach to contact a player at another ncaa institution. i'm not saying McKay would refuse to do so, but it's not like a coach would be setting precedent by refusing to do so.kentuckywildcats wrote:i am not shuk, i don't even know who that is.OK, I don't claim to be an expert, so if I'm wrong, correct me. Release from what?!!!! He doesn't have a scholarship. As far as I know he can talk to anyone he wants to. Even if what you are saying is true, do you honestly think RMc would refuse to release him to go somewhere he can get a scholarship which we wouldn't offer him? I think not!
also, for ohman to get a scholarship elsewhere or even have another school be able to legally talk to him, he would have to get his athletic release from Liberty, which means McKay would have to approve of it.
SuperJon wrote:and by the way. i was impressed with the play of anthony smith. reminded me a little of josh howard, who is my favorite nba player, by the way.kentuckywildcats wrote:i'm interested to see ohman shoot the threes that well against a good team, but i admit he's shot is money.Shuk, have you ever given Liberty credit for anything? Ever?
olldflame wrote:Armon's name seems to be the one that comes up when we talk about players who are a waste of a scholarship, but at least he's made it onto the floor this year, and IMHO has made a little progress.Yes last night was a breakthrough for him
Cider Jim wrote:OF, I have to say that I've been mildly impressed with Armon this year compared to last. The 2007 version of Armon seems to be more trim, more mobile inside, with decent footwork. If that will translate into more minutes, points, and rebounds, only time will tell.Im just not sure if hell improve enough to deserve that scholly of his over anyone coming in this year
Cider Jim wrote:OF, I have to say that I've been mildly impressed with Armon this year compared to last. The 2007 version of Armon seems to be more trim, more mobile inside, with decent footwork. If that will translate into more minutes, points, and rebounds, only time will tell.You can't be serious.
SuperJon wrote:There was player development under the previous staff? Really? I didn't know that existed.That is what I was asking...and apparently I have my answer.
Seriously, name one player under the previous staff that got better year to year.
SuperJon wrote:Anthony Smith was no better last year than he was as a freshman. The jump he's made from sophomore to junior is incredible.Any offense that Rell gives at this point is gravy. It totally dissapeared when he arrived on-campus, he certaintly didn't score 27ppg in HS by dominating athletically. He has some good moves down low and can shoot the three as we've seen this year, he's just now got a green-light.
Look at Rell's jump shot. It's not great by any means, but it's light years from where it was under the previous staff.
I hate you Merry Christmas :D :lol: May[…]