Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
RD has never ever overachieved while he was in charge... always been underachievers... SJ, The flames have more $$$, better facilities, nice town, can get any student based on grades or transfers in school, why the heck can't they have at least one winning record the last 10 or 11 years??? And 6 of those RD was in charge....Discuss.
SuperJon wrote:Just because I won't be home all afternoon and want you guys to argue like little girls, here is something a smart man outside of the LU bubble once said to me:oops, he left out the culture of LU. Must have been an oversight on his part.
RD has never ever overachieved while he was in charge... always been underachievers... SJ, The flames have more $$$, better facilities, nice town, can get any student based on grades or transfers in school, why the heck can't they have at least one winning record the last 10 or 11 years??? And 6 of those RD was in charge....Discuss.
LUconn wrote:You can't compare us nationally. I know that's the goal, but we're just not at that level yet and we never have been. No matter how good we may or may not have played UNC for one half. Now if you think RD hasn't been up to snuff in the BSC then sure by all means, suggest we get rid of him. But don't act like you want to get rid of him because we're not a top 100 team. Most of the time that takes many years and multiple successful coaches.OK, we can't compare ourselves nationally, even though that is the goal. Where are you happy measuring us? How about the top 50% of all D1 teams? We are currently 258 out of 330+ teams, so not there.
LUconn wrote:A lot of what you're saying makes sense, but it seems like you want to punish RD for the last 12 years of stagnancy (is that a word?) He's been successful in the conference, brought us 1 of our only 2 BSC trophies, and kept us in the upper half of the league. It's the first steps, and we have had a recent setback, but I just don't see how you can let him go based on HIS body of work thus far.How about a career record of 77-100 at LU? Should it be our goal to be "successsful" in the conference? How do we measure success in the conference, one game over .500, two, three? "Upper half" of the worst league in D1? A lot of people here complain about how the BS sucks, well shouldn't we then accept nothing less than to be the best of the suckers? (I thought that was pretty funny myself). I would hate to think that I would be content with anything less than dominating a conference that "sucks".
WWJFD wrote:I know there is RPI, SOS, and all that, but seriously, are we one of the worst conferences in Division 1. Numbers aside here are the conferences I feel we are comparable or better than by scanning on the different one's in alphabetical order.WWJFD,
America East, Big Sky, Ivy, MAAC, Mid-Eastern, Northeast, Southland, SWAC, Sun Belt.
I think apples for apples if we matched up seeding wise conference vs. conference, we would be competitive or defeat many of them.
Just a thought
I hate you Merry Christmas :D :lol: May[…]