Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
PLEASE tell me you are not talking about me 
SuperJon wrote:We're not building a 60,000 seat stadium. We're building a 30,000 seat stadium. The 60,000 number is when our grandkids have grandkids at Liberty.
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
Hold My Own wrote:I think we could consider it a FF stimulus plan. All the guests that only come on here to read and not post will now be forced to sign up in order to get rid of some of the foolishness!FF stimulus plan huh? Sounds good to me... but does that mean FF will hafta go into debt?
Hold My Own wrote:All the guests that only come on here to read and not post will now be forced to sign up in order to get rid of some of the foolishness!We could force everyone to register in order to read, but we won't go that route. It just ends up killing traffic to the site. I do, however, purge users who register and don't post after a certain period of time.
olldflame wrote:Someone here, unless they change their pattern dramatically, will never have a post seen or read once this upgrade is made because they will be on everyone's ignore list. It's really annoying to log on and see the same username as the last poster on most of the forums, and you feel like you need to check to see if something has actually been said, but you know it's probably just a waste of time because it's just an emoticon or something silly.So so true
JLFJR wrote: We just need to get the environmentalist wackos out of the way
olldflame wrote:PLEASE not meAZjonz wrote:"Most ignored poster" award at year's end, maybe?I think the vote might be unanomous.
SuperJon wrote:We're not building a 60,000 seat stadium. We're building a 30,000 seat stadium. The 60,000 number is when our grandkids have grandkids at Liberty.
rueful wrote:like someone who has a double quote that has original post, followed by someone else quoting it and replying with just an emoticon, and then someone else just quoting the whole thing and replying with another emoticon.
Better yet, why dont we just get rid of emoticons altogether. What purpose to them is there? None. Plus, super easy fix for El Scorcho, I imagine, at least compared to upgrading the entire site
El Scorcho wrote:I do, however, purge users who register and don't post after a certain period of time.How much time do you give users between posts?
flames1971 wrote:I am not going to lie, you are the first user I though of when I saw the title of this thread.
LUconn wrote:I wasn't going to name names but I was thinking about SJ.Good. Relief.
SuperJon wrote:We're not building a 60,000 seat stadium. We're building a 30,000 seat stadium. The 60,000 number is when our grandkids have grandkids at Liberty.
Covert Hawk wrote:I was the first person I thought of tooflames1971 wrote:I am not going to lie, you are the first user I though of when I saw the title of this thread.
SuperJon wrote:We're not building a 60,000 seat stadium. We're building a 30,000 seat stadium. The 60,000 number is when our grandkids have grandkids at Liberty.
- By olldflame
So, we have the depth chart for Saturday, but stil[…]
- By aredd33
First of all, I'm really glad to be back. Second […]
........................................................ 
- By LUOrange