- November 21st, 2014, 12:15 pm
#468252
Heartbreaking...but honestly, I'm not shocked by the details.
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
Sly Fox wrote:The piece is actually very well written, Haize. El Scorcho tipped me off to this story the other day and it indeed is sickening. It is tough to eat lunch after reading even a few paragraphs.I read it when it first came out. RS has good writing. It's just the veracity of it that I question at times. This seemed to have a lot of sensationalism in it that I've come to expect. Again, not denying it's a bad thing if true, just not swallowing it hook line and sinker.
Sly Fox wrote:No, I suggest that something more substantial would be appropriate as opposed to cancelling a few parties for the couple of weeks left in the calendar year. This is how UVa gives the appearance of doing something when in fact they really have done practically nothing.THIS would be an appropriate response:
ATrain wrote:Guilty until proven innocentSly Fox wrote:No, I suggest that something more substantial would be appropriate as opposed to cancelling a few parties for the couple of weeks left in the calendar year. This is how UVa gives the appearance of doing something when in fact they really have done practically nothing.THIS would be an appropriate response:
#1 Calling the state police to investigate the alleged crimes
#2 The president of the school not sending out an e-mail where the first words are about the "negative portrayal of the University."
#3 Not re-instating any fraternity until the investigations are completed
Purple Haize wrote:Aren't most people removed from their positions while investigations into crimes/misconducts are ongoing? We're not advocating for complete and total disbandment, just continuation of the suspensions...similar to way others get put on "paid administrative leave until the investigations are completed."ATrain wrote:Guilty until proven innocentSly Fox wrote:No, I suggest that something more substantial would be appropriate as opposed to cancelling a few parties for the couple of weeks left in the calendar year. This is how UVa gives the appearance of doing something when in fact they really have done practically nothing.THIS would be an appropriate response:
#1 Calling the state police to investigate the alleged crimes
#2 The president of the school not sending out an e-mail where the first words are about the "negative portrayal of the University."
#3 Not re-instating any fraternity until the investigations are completed
Purple Haize wrote:Only Government workers get Paid Administrative Leave. The rest of us get fired, asked to step down, reallocated or severances.And UVA is a public school...so therefore the fraternities can be suspended until the investigations are complete.
Sly Fox wrote:No, I suggest that something more substantial would be appropriate as opposed to cancelling a few parties for the couple of weeks left in the calendar year. This is how UVa gives the appearance of doing something when in fact they really have done practically nothing.Yep, suspending frats isn't going to stop people from raping.
BuryYourDuke wrote:Purple was right about this. There is a lot fishy here after reading the post article. It does nothing to change the overwhelming nature of the problem at UVA and other campuses, but it certainly takes some of the sensationalism out of this particular case. I hope it's not true, and not that she just misremembered things in some sort of post-traumatic haze.Hey now !!!!
Unreadable tripe, really And while throwing the[…]