- June 8th, 2008, 8:48 pm
#179875
In Tucson, we have a neighborhood that is called Winterhaven. Middle class houses, but it has a huge neighborhood Christmas spectacular and an eclectic mix of houses with interesting yards and styles. People love the neighborhood, yet, construction-wise, the houses are not anything of special design.
Now they sell for a lot of money, but you get much nicer features on a newer house for cheaper. To me that seems to be a bit subjective. I think Peakland is like this, too.
Now, you can look at comps, # of bedrooms and size, and upgrades and add dollars to that fairly easy. Location and perception add another value that may be more subjective. Or does the demand dictate the price? (I mean I know it does, but how do you say this unique house is highly desirable therefore it has more value than this other house in the same neighborhood that is completely different.)
Another scenario – my parents own a house on 100 acres that has a very unique design and style. No other houses are like it. It was designed by a well-to-do architect in Scottsdale, AZ, so the home is a real gem. How does something like that get valued when there are no other benchmarks available as far as other like houses being sold?
I’m not sure if I’m communicating this clearly enough to ask the right questions about dealing with the “grey” areas of home valuation, but maybe I’ve stumble my way though this enough to give you something to work with.
Gracias
SuperJon wrote:Let me see…AZjonz wrote:SJ, you look at comps and other data to try to come up with an objective value. How do you account for the subjective value? Or is that accounted for by market forces? Just curious now that it is being discussed.What exactly are you considering subjective value? We have to get that clear before I even start to try to answer the question.
In Tucson, we have a neighborhood that is called Winterhaven. Middle class houses, but it has a huge neighborhood Christmas spectacular and an eclectic mix of houses with interesting yards and styles. People love the neighborhood, yet, construction-wise, the houses are not anything of special design.
Now they sell for a lot of money, but you get much nicer features on a newer house for cheaper. To me that seems to be a bit subjective. I think Peakland is like this, too.
Now, you can look at comps, # of bedrooms and size, and upgrades and add dollars to that fairly easy. Location and perception add another value that may be more subjective. Or does the demand dictate the price? (I mean I know it does, but how do you say this unique house is highly desirable therefore it has more value than this other house in the same neighborhood that is completely different.)
Another scenario – my parents own a house on 100 acres that has a very unique design and style. No other houses are like it. It was designed by a well-to-do architect in Scottsdale, AZ, so the home is a real gem. How does something like that get valued when there are no other benchmarks available as far as other like houses being sold?
I’m not sure if I’m communicating this clearly enough to ask the right questions about dealing with the “grey” areas of home valuation, but maybe I’ve stumble my way though this enough to give you something to work with.
Gracias





- By rtb72
- By LU Armchair coach