Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke


Sly Fox wrote:Mark my words. Peterson will not only be a great NFL running back but he could very well be the best of this era if he stays healthy. He played the last two years behind a swiss cheese line at OU.Based on his history, that's a big 'if'. I'm not arguing Proto's point b/c he lost me at Chester Taylor but AP has showed thus far that he's only spectacular for 8 games a season. BTW, Proto, none of those backs you listed actually "sucked". All of them, with the exception of Phillips, came into the league and showed a lot of promise only to have their careers derailed by injuries. Phillips, on the other hand, stayed healthy and was an offensive weapon for several teams, none of whom could screw his head on straight.
prototype wrote: Chester Taylor is not bad - he's not great, but he has some experience and he is a bruser.No, he's not bad. He's just anywhere the caliber of athlete that Peterson is.
I would argue the point on the running backs. Give me some stats to build your case. 1,000 yards between them all?:)Nah, too much work. I'll have to go off of memory. Carter and Salaam both started the season openers for their teams as rookies but neither made it past Week 7(?) before the injury bug bit them. Biakabatuka was hampered his first two years and then was having a Pro Bowl-caliber season for Carolina in his 3rd year before blowing out his ACL.
SuperJon wrote: I love dc Talk.
