Sly Fox wrote: ↑November 16th, 2021, 10:11 am
Trying to view historical issues through a current lens is rarely productive. Without context it is tough to decipher thought processes. Suffice it to say that many in the LU community regret stances taken back then from a political perspective. It doesn't mean that they haven't seen the light since.
For me it is about action rather than words. A current director-level individual was implicated by several Jane Does and is still employed, not on leave, and still in charge of student health records. Individuals who helped cover it up and move him from Dean of Students to an out of the way job are still employed and not on leave pending an investigation. Others in the administration knew about this, and probably a lot more beyond the allegations against the above referenced individuals.
Jr, and others, were made aware of the harassment I am referencing as early as 2012 in writing. If the internal investigation failed to locate these emails then I would question the quality of that effort.