- January 14th, 2007, 4:11 pm
#52896
As far as the coach thing goes, it's ok if we disagree, no need to get touchy about it.
Apparently, you would strongly favor bringing in a successful NAIA guy in here, whereas my ideal, if I thought a change was in order, would be to grab a top assistant at an overachieving mid-major such as Butler because I think that the mid-major guy would be a direct correlation to what we need to get done here.
I'm certainly not here to dis any level of competition, but that would be too huge of a step up for the guy from a place like Cedarville and creates too many unknowns and therefore a tremendous risk in my estimation.
Purple Haize wrote:DOX, no I got ya. I know we approach it from different perspectives. You dont think anyone NOT at the division 1 level is worthy to be made a division 1 head coach. Got it. I think there are some out there (and it looks like someone else does too - My Side : 2 Your Side : ??A big part of the problem is the "gotcha attitide". Why do yo need to "get" someone? There is no real need to take a little sports coversation personally. If that's what it's all about for some on this board, then it's ok with me, they certainly have the right, but in my view it takes away from the conversation.) and have more names than the Cedarville coach. What am I not getting?
As far as the coach thing goes, it's ok if we disagree, no need to get touchy about it.
Apparently, you would strongly favor bringing in a successful NAIA guy in here, whereas my ideal, if I thought a change was in order, would be to grab a top assistant at an overachieving mid-major such as Butler because I think that the mid-major guy would be a direct correlation to what we need to get done here.
I'm certainly not here to dis any level of competition, but that would be too huge of a step up for the guy from a place like Cedarville and creates too many unknowns and therefore a tremendous risk in my estimation.




- By ECC29