Sly Fox wrote:It is funny that you'd go that route. Because my generation thinks of this crazy Dominican ...Yep, that's the first one I thought of when I heard it was named that.
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
Sly Fox wrote:It is funny that you'd go that route. Because my generation thinks of this crazy Dominican ...Yep, that's the first one I thought of when I heard it was named that.
Sly Fox wrote:It is funny that you'd go that route. Because my generation thinks of this crazy Dominican ...You call that crazy? I have 3 Dominicans living in my house who make him look like an introvert.
PAmedic wrote:you're absolutely right
PAmedic wrote:you're absolutely right
ATrain wrote:Amazing what a little investment in science and technology research, not to mention infrastructure, can do. Looks like the newer Euro model is being proven right again.The difference between the two is that the EURO at least generates some revenue from its operations. They charge $250k for a subscription to the data and maintain copywrights for it. The US GFS model is maintained by the NOAA and a collection of colleges/universities and it is open for public consumption free of charge. They've done a lot of research on the model to pinpoint the shortfalls even going as far as to invite the ECMWF to investigate. They believe the issue relates to the pool of data that feeds into the model itself (initialization data). They took what the ECMWF initialized and the model performed much better compared to its own initialization. So, you are right partially - more investment needs to occur. But, if you're a college/university or a government entity, would you want to spend precious cash on a project you will get nothing out of? The answer, in my opinion, is to privatize the thing and leverage the resources of the colleges and universities to improve the model so that it can actually compete with the ECMWF. Then you start selling it.
Cider Jim wrote:Darrell Laurant in the Lynchburg newspaper, comparing the flood of 1985 to what Lynchburg should be preparing for this weekend:
http://www.newsadvance.com/news/local/r ... c4aa8.html
thepostman wrote:I would much rather them oversell than be way off and then have people not prepared.Agreed. I have about 3" in the rain gauge since Friday. While not historic, that is still significant, especially given the nearly 7" we had in the previous 10 days. I think they did a pretty good job, at least the local guy I follow the most.
Cider Jim wrote:Darrell Laurant in the Lynchburg newspaper, comparing the flood of 1985 to what Lynchburg should be preparing for this weekend:Darrell Laurant is not a meterologist. He also issued a caveat in his article that the historic rainfall amounts depended on whether Jaoquin would make landfall and that the weather models were split as to whether or not that would happen. I consider myself an enthusiast for this sort of thing and I can tell you that most of the weather models that truly matter had Jaoquin staying well offshore. From abut late Wednesday onward, almost every precipitation map I saw had Lynchburg in the 2 - 4" range.
http://www.newsadvance.com/news/local/r ... c4aa8.html
olldflame wrote:Little known fact: The job I applied for in 2005 was the Virginia Tech beat opening that Nathan Warters got. They were thinking of making a change on the LU beat anyway, so they got rid of my predecessor and hired me for a job covering LU and auto racing. But that job wasn't even open when I was looking. Nathan had more experience covering autos, so we ultimately chose to have him do VT/auto and me do LU and golf. I didn't view it as a consolation prize, mostly because I had covered lower-level DI sports for eight years in Flagstaff and was well versed in FCS football and low-major hoops. The fact that the N&A actually had a travel budget excited me. Also, I was coming from a smaller paper where I was sports editor and had to do hands-on layout and design work three or four days a week, along with writing. So being able to be a) closer to home and b) simply a writer really made the gig appealing. It was my beat and I was going to do everything to own it, so it ended up being a beneficial thing for both me and LU fans who read my stuff. The scope of the beat grew tremendously over the decade that I covered it, and I tried to grow along with it. Anyway, figured I'd respond since I was mentioned here.Cider Jim wrote:Darrell Laurant in the Lynchburg newspaper, comparing the flood of 1985 to what Lynchburg should be preparing for this weekend:
http://www.newsadvance.com/news/local/r ... c4aa8.html
The original bearded scribe of the News and Advance comes out of retirement! Glad to hear Darrell is still alive and kicking. He is a talented writer, although it seemed to me that when he was covering LU athletics back in the day he was less than enthusiastic about that part of his job. Actually, the same could pretty much be said for every reporter there who had that assignment til Lang came along. I really don´t know if Chris was all that excited about it either to begin with, but he was always thorough and professional, and I think ultimately we ¨grew on him¨.
Again - I don't think recruiting has taken a massi[…]