- April 16th, 2014, 12:39 pm
#452031
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
BJWilliams wrote:LU has not lost a conference game since the Campbell series...magic number is now 9 pending the Campbell result.3 full pulls = bjism?
This is what...3 straight full pulls from Trey now?
adam42381 wrote:It's a sophomoric self-pleasure joke.BJWilliams wrote:LU has not lost a conference game since the Campbell series...magic number is now 9 pending the Campbell result.3 full pulls = bjism?
This is what...3 straight full pulls from Trey now?
BJWilliams wrote:Only if you have a sick and depraved mind perv...Seems accurate.
olldflame wrote:It's not 3 straight complete games for Lambert. Stafford pitched the last 2 innings of his start last week against Longwood. Before that he pitched complete game shutouts against VMI and Presby.It's full pulls.
BJWilliams wrote:Within this context, both are intended to be used interchangably sweaty one...that is to say, a "full pull" is how I define a complete game pitching performance
jcmanson wrote:Has anyone ever heard the term "full pull" in relation to a complete game prior to this thread? I haven't.Although it was easy enough to ascertain his meaning in context, I have never heard it used to refer to a complete game (nor was I familiar with the usage VAGolf mentioned, which I would have been fine not knowing). It's a tractor pull term. Means your 3000 HP monster machine pulled the ridiculously heavy sled the full designated distance.
jcmanson wrote:Has anyone ever heard the term "full pull" in relation to a complete game prior to this thread? I haven't.how dare you? dont you know the rules: