ValleyBoy wrote:BearlyDoug, Idaho and NMSU do not have a vote. The six western members that have a vote are, UTA, TxSt, ArkSt, UALR, ULM, and ULL.
Thank you... I appreciate the clarification. Glad to know I wasn't wrong on Idaho and NMSU.
jlread wrote:I thought I heard Texas St liked us!?!?!?
They're still trying to feel out their own position and Status... plus, they're really busy hating on UTSA (I have followers from both programs. It's hilarious to watch the interaction and trash talking between 'em, haha!)
BuryYourDuke wrote:It's a domino effect. If we get one or two of the hold outs, other schools will go along with them.
Here's the kicker to all of this. ULL wants out of the Sun Belt. They feel that they're playing in an inferior league (AKA WKU). Everyone else (Appy State, Georgia Southern, Georgia State... and yes, Liberty) LOVE the Sun Belt... and lobbied hard to get in (or in GSU Panthers' case, rejoin).
Biggest complaint most of the schools have (rightfully so) were the Bowl tie-ins and TV contract.
We had Karl Benson on TCR a several months ago, and we grilled him about both... he said that he was working on the Bowl situation first, and then adding teams to stabilize the league.
IF I remember correctly, he listed his priorities as follows:
1. Increase the number of Bowl tie-ins (4 guaranteed bowls plus up to 2 more on a rotational basis - CHECK)
2. Get the league to 12 CFB schools and STABLE (with WKU leaving, SBC is at 11. With JMU getting all hoity-toity, Liberty's definitely lookin' good). Sun Belt wants to have a Conf Championship game, which would bring in additional exposure and revenue. The focus/emphasis is to get schools that WANT to be in the Sun Belt Conf.
3. Get a TV contract that increases exposure for ALL Sun Belt Schools. Bringing in Appy State (remember the 2007 game where they upset a top ranked Michigan team?!) and Georgia Southern (making it a habit of beating SEC schools in a few sports) definitely increases the exposure... but there's still no one MARQUEE school that stands out (SEC is Alabama, Big 12 is Texas, Big 10 has a couple.... Pac 12 has USC, Cal, Stanford, etc). ESPN might not be the way to go, IMHO. With ESPN dominating the sports market, the SBC may need to look at Fox Sports or NBC Sports to get this contract in. Both TV networks are struggling to keep up with ESPN and would probably jump at the chance to work with SBC, IF the money was right for both entities.
4. Earn some RESPECT from all other conferences. The fact that the SBC had 8 of 9 member schools Bowl Eligible last year but only two made it into Bowl Games... and for this past MBB season... having several (very deserving, IMHO) schools that should have gone into the NCAAT (come on.. A10 sent 6 teams?! Pfffffft!) shows that this is probably going to be the biggest challenge to overcome.
Getting the right schools and right TV partner into place can take care of each and every point above.