- April 10th, 2014, 12:08 am
#451476
GW is in the conference we are currently playing in. so yes, playing them does do something for me. wouldn't want to take a forfeit.
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
JakeP50 wrote:Why are the public universities so against bringing in a Christian university? The Big12 has not one but two, Baylor and TCU, and Baylor has been a member since them along with Texas, A&M and Tech merged with the Big8 to create the Big12. Why is the Sun Belt so picky about this, the Big 12 was totally fine with Baylor being a Baptist university AND THEN ADDED ANOTHER.I get where you're coming from, but this is what I gathered from Baylor and TCU being in the Big 12. First, Baylor. They have been the bratty little brother that has benefited from the big dogs of the state of Texas. They also have some of the best lawyers from their school and will sue you in a heartbeat if you try to separate from them and put them in a bad situation financially.![]()
flamesfilmguy wrote:Baylor and TCU are Christian in name only universities. its not that hard to differentiate between us and them. They have the academic prowess that we do not possess yet. our ONLY hope is that JMU is stupid enough to turn down an SBC offer.You're right about TCU... but I would disagree regarding Baylor. No doubt that Baylor has academic prowess that exceeds our own in every category, but they are not Christian in name only. I've never been to the school personally, but have done research and spoken with people who would know and they are still a Christian university. They just aren't quite as 'evangelical' about it...
and for the love of all things sacred if one more person says we should go independent it will drive me to drinking. WE CAN NOT GO INDY BECAUSE ITS NOT ALLOWED. and don't think just because we have a law school and "really good" lawyers or whatever that it means we can just take on the LARGEST COLLEGE SPORTS CONGLOMERATE IN THE NATION the NCAA to get what we want. Face it guys we are pretty much screwed unless JMU's Faculty get what they want.
Humble_Opinion wrote:You're right about TCU... but I would disagree regarding Baylor. No doubt that Baylor has academic prowess that exceeds our own in every category, but they are not Christian in name only. I've never been to the school personally, but have done research and spoken with people who would know and they are still a Christian university. They just aren't quite as 'evangelical' about it...I agree Baylor is hanging pretty tough. I was happy to see us on their football schedule. They have scheduled their Catholic neighbor University of Incarnate Word for 2019. Would be nice to see schools like ND, BYU and Baylor work more closely with the up and coming private schools.
Brent Thibodeaux @BrentThibodeaux 16h
Sources have told me the #SunBelt 12th school hopefuls are in this order. First #JMU followed by #MissouriState & #Liberty in a distant 3rd.
Blessed1 wrote:Ok that makes sense, I'm pretty far outside the Big12's natural region so the media doesn't cover their inner workings as much as they do with the ACC.JakeP50 wrote:Why are the public universities so against bringing in a Christian university? The Big12 has not one but two, Baylor and TCU, and Baylor has been a member since them along with Texas, A&M and Tech merged with the Big8 to create the Big12. Why is the Sun Belt so picky about this, the Big 12 was totally fine with Baylor being a Baptist university AND THEN ADDED ANOTHER.I get where you're coming from, but this is what I gathered from Baylor and TCU being in the Big 12. First, Baylor. They have been the bratty little brother that has benefited from the big dogs of the state of Texas. They also have some of the best lawyers from their school and will sue you in a heartbeat if you try to separate from them and put them in a bad situation financially.![]()
Now, TCU. They are only in the Big 12 because Texas wanted another Texas school to replace Texas A&M. They did however earned their way to the big boy table due to their recent success in football. Patterson has done a wonderful job thus far and their win over Wisconsin in the Rose Bowl is still considered a classic. Their inclusion was more of a "right place, right time" type of addition.
If Liberty gets added to the Sun Belt it would be due to a "right place, right time" situation. This may explain why we're still in the Big South. The Big South needed schools and we were there. It was a 'marriage by convenience' type of relationship. They didn't care about Falwell's political or religious views. Other conferences did care about them and that's why we probably stayed in the Big South so long even though it's clear that we've outgrown the conference.
BuryYourDuke wrote:I disagree, but I'm curious what makes it embarrassing?SuperJon wrote:Missouri State getting an invite before us would be more embarrassing than any of the WTF games in football.Seriously.
SuperJon wrote:Shows how far down we are in the national perception. The Sun Belt would rather beg a school to make the jump before asking someone who is begging to join them.The western members of the division want another western member. The conference landscape has been moving eastward and Missouri State is the best long term FCS school for the conference in this part of the country. They have good sports, facilities and a mediocre football team. The western members are looking out for their best interests. Their opportunity to add a western team is during the negotiation process, not after the fact of an eastern team being named. All along, JMU has been the frontrunner from the east. That has not changed. I'm not convinced that they want it yet. That's how I see it.
SumItUp wrote:What if the process involves all of our good coaches and our AD jumping ship to a higher profile program? Gill and Toman especially, I really like both of them and I don't want them to leave because the competition sucks.SuperJon wrote:Shows how far down we are in the national perception. The Sun Belt would rather beg a school to make the jump before asking someone who is begging to join them.SJ, if I'm correct, you made the statement about 3 years ago on FF that we were 20 years away from a move to FBS. It may happen this year. If not, we are moving in the right direction. We are closer than we have ever been.
Enjoy the process!
CinciFlame wrote:I know the independent word is not liked around here, but if the NCAA allowed us to move to FBS as an Indy in football only I think I would much rather go that route than keeping playing the Big South schools. If we were FBS I think we would be surprised who we may get to come to Liberty. It would be an FBS game and would count towards being bowl eligible. I'm not saying the big boys, but I would think we could get home and home with MAC and SB schools.
https://www.liberty.edu/news/2026/04/24/spring-202[…]