If you find a post where I advocated this as our present course of action, post it. Otherwise read my posts and respond accordingly if you're going to address me. Don't talk junk without reading. It's annoying and it shows your rear.
Going back you will see me give plenty of qualifications to my post. I said that I have no idea if we are being blackballed or not. I went on to say "If we were..." then this would be a course I could see working. If the worst conference in the top tier is proven to be blocking your ability for revenue and exposure and if a rule only exists in one sport and if the disqualifying (and subjective) reason has to do with free speech, political affiliations or religious freedom (see all of these if's?)... THEN a suit may be valid and worthwhile.
Obviously it's a dumb idea to try to ram down a door if there is any reasonable expectation that you still have a shot to get in by playing nice. If however you have a budget over twice ULM and could realistically get your budget to 30+ million... it stands to reason that other reasons are at play here and it's worthwhile to reserve the right to press forward.
There's not much more that annoys me than ignorance disguised as intelligence. Read what's posted and understand it or else don't say a word about it. You can disagree, I would just love to disagree with people who fully understand what I said.
