Anything and everything about Liberty Flames football. Your comments on games, recruiting and the direction of the program as we move into new era.

Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke, Class of 20Something

User avatar
By BJWilliams
Registration Days Posts
#421629
adam42381 wrote: Interesting. Has Jr. ever given an explanation behind this line of thinking? BJ, maybe it's time for another PM...
Jon covered it pretty well and as PH said...its common knowledge already
User avatar
By Purple Haize
Registration Days Posts
#421631
adam42381 wrote:So, what happens if/when the money dries up from LU Online?
We channel our inner crown prince of Dubai?
User avatar
By adam42381
Registration Days Posts
#421632
BJWilliams wrote:
adam42381 wrote: Interesting. Has Jr. ever given an explanation behind this line of thinking? BJ, maybe it's time for another PM...
Jon covered it pretty well and as PH said...its common knowledge already
Agreed. I just disagree with the idea that private donation is something to avoid.

**Edited for clarity**
Last edited by adam42381 on March 1st, 2013, 3:41 pm, edited 3 times in total.
By JK37
Registration Days Posts
#421637
Purple Haize wrote:But if the premise is true you can't really disagree with it
Sheesh, do we sound that arrogant? Haha!

A man I look up to, often said to me: "how is it cocky if you're right and you know it?" His wife often disagreed.
By olldflame
Registration Days Posts
#421660
SuperJon wrote:
adam42381 wrote:
JK37 wrote:Not to mention, in the context of Liberty specifically, the highest levels of administration expressly dislike private development. So, not sure the acquisition of monetary donations in the future is of any consequence or motivation.
Is this something that's common knowledge? Do you have a source? I'm curious because I've never read/heard this before.
Completely true. Jr doesn't like big monetary donations because he feels like it gives the donor a seat at the table. He doesn't like anyone having control other than himself (see: new logo). He believes that the Harvards and Yales and Baylors lost their way religiously because they allowed donors a seat at the table to influence how they did things.
His dad on the other hand welcomed them, with mixed results. I have never heard any indication that Art Williams attached any strings to his generosity. The same cannot be said of others.

While it is of little significance when compared with maintaining the universities mission and avoiding the path of the Harvards and Yales of the world, giving doners a seat at the table IMHO had a disastrous effect on our basketball program. Even though those days are long past, for some reason it has never really recovered.
User avatar
By Purple Haize
Registration Days Posts
#421668
JK37 wrote:
Purple Haize wrote:But if the premise is true you can't really disagree with it
Sheesh, do we sound that arrogant? Haha!

A man I look up to, often said to me: "how is it cocky if you're right and you know it?" His wife often disagreed.
She disagrees with me often :D
User avatar
By PAmedic
Registration Days Posts
#421676
oh this is getting good.

this is why I like it when SJ posts.

looking forward to a response :nod
User avatar
By Purple Haize
Registration Days Posts
#421715
PAmedic wrote:oh this is getting good.

this is why I like it when SJ posts.

looking forward to a response :nod
It would just go over your head........
LU Campus Construction Thread

I thought years ago they thought about doing an up[…]

2027 Commits

Well played, Alabama24. I sat on a flight from OR[…]

Are we back?

Nice! Here is to hoping we can live bot free.