- February 19th, 2013, 10:23 am
#420626
Plans change & life isn't fair... the softball facility should have been addressed years ago, prior to the +$5,000,000 Baseball Stadium. You are asking a coach to recruit a D1 level pitcher and your "set of steak knives" is a construction trailer, 20 year old cinder block dugouts, and a nice quiet field away from the heart beat of the campus. Did I mention it's in Lynchburg...
Purple Haize wrote:I have to agree with this approach. Most people would understand the importance of the land, future plans, etc. One could even argue where they built the new baseball, and future 2nd indoor football practice field, is prime land as well (10 years from now as some have suggested).logic wrote:Had they said ' We aren't going to use the Worthington site because the needs of the University have changed due to XY and Z. However, we are going to build the new softball on Site X and it will be completed in time for the 2014 season.' Heck, they could have even released an artists renditioning of the new place.
Plans change & life isn't fair... the softball facility should have been addressed years ago, prior to the +$5,000,000 Baseball Stadium. You are asking a coach to recruit a D1 level pitcher and your "set of steak knives" is a construction trailer, 20 year old cinder block dugouts, and a nice quiet field away from the heart beat of the campus. Did I mention it's in Lynchburg...