BJWilliams wrote:lynchburgwildcats wrote:Sly Fox wrote:Dude, it is non-scholarship D3. That's a notch above rec league.
You really want to go there, really? Not wise when the scholarship, Division I Liberty field hockey team lost to a D3 team that finished fourth in its conference with an overall losing record. http://www.libertyflames.com/index.cfm? ... &TeamID=18
Telling me your field hockey team with scholarship players couldn't even beat a team that is "above rec league" or "glorified intramurals" to use a term from the past that's been uttered on this board?
How else would you like to insult your own school?
You do realize that this a) was a year ago and b) was with a brand new squad that by that point had played six games in its history?
So let me get this straight, you're now making excuses for why a DI scholarship team couldn't get the job done on the field against a glorified intramural team from D3?
You do realize that:
a) Eastern Mennonite, who LU lost to 2-1, finished the 2011 season with a 10-11 overall record, 9-11 against the glorified intramual Division III.
b) Eastern Mennonite lost games by scores of 4-0, 8-1, 7-0, 5-1, 7-2, and 4-1 against glorified intramural teams from Division III
c) Eastern Mennonite lost twice to Lynchburg 7-0 and 4-0, a team which is nothing but a "notch above rec league"?
And you're making EXCUSES for why a Division 1 scholarship field hockey team couldn't beat this ever so glorious squad? Is that really the best you got as a comeback to the field hockey loss?
At least when when the other argued over track they brought a reasonable and logical argument, this feeble attempt at a comeback is just a sad, embarrassing joke.
- By LUGrad2000
- By ballah09