- July 25th, 2012, 12:06 pm
#397047
If this is what redbull does to you, you may want to slow it down..just sayin..
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
bradyfan wrote:Sly -Technically, that is correct based on my understanding. The only caveat being that for it to work I believe we would have to be come in as an all sports member. And since 2013 the WAC won't be sponsoring FBS football, there could be concerns of whether or not the invitation would technically be coming from an FBS league.
This idea could be a complete long shot in terms of probability. However, what if we accepted an invite to the WAC, say tomorrow, but the conference never got to the 8 teams needed to remain an FBS conference, could we then become an independent? I know you can't just leap from FCS to FBS and be an independent, but this way we actually would have joined a conference then have no home. Don't judge my grammar on this, I'm watching my two year old brother as I'm typing.
bradyfan wrote: Worst case scenario, we go independent for three years, it doesn't work out and we go back to playing FCS football probably in a better conference than what we're in now.They aren't making these decisions with monopoly money.
RVAparks wrote:bradyfan wrote: Worst case scenario, we go independent for three years, it doesn't work out and we go back to playing FCS football probably in a better conference than what we're in now.They aren't making these decisions with monopoly money.
Mountain West Expansion: No Idaho, No Conference USA, No Nothin'
by Jason Kirk
MOUNT USA is dead. Or at least almost dead. The grand idea that was the merger between the Mountain West and Conference USA, thereby creating a single league of two dozen teams, "probably" is not going to happen, MWC commissioner Craig Thompson said during Mountain West Media Days on Wednesday.
It's just too complicated to make it work, Thompson said, and let's just imagine what would've happened if somebody had said the Louisiana Purchase was too complicated. This is America. It probably is really complicated, though. Combine that with the suspended scheduling deal between the Pac-12 and Big Ten, and it's clear everybody got just a little bit carried away with grand ideas during the last phase of realignment fever.
In further sadness, the conference prefers to sit tight at 10 teams for the time being, meaning:
Brian Murphy @murphsturphThat Plan B probably won't include the Sun Belt, and the WAC is basically dead, so just about the only option left is to drop down a level. Or try out independence, and it's hard to imagine that would go well.
Idaho and New Mexico State have been told they will not be members of the Mountain West. "Go on to Plan B"
http://www.sbnation.com/ncaa-football/2 ... erence-usa
The commissioner (Craig Thompson) did indicate that the league might be interested in adding a Texas school or schools. He said the league visited with UT-San Antonio, which is joining Conference USA, and received material from Texas State. Conference USA member Texas-El Paso is also an intriguing candidate for the Mountain West.
"If, for whatever reason, they tire of traveling to Miami and Charlotte and Norfolk, Virginia, we would have conversations with them," Thompson said, referencing the locations of several new Conference USA members.
"I don't want to put any pressures or false hopes that we're having conversations with UTEP. We are not."
http://voices.idahostatesman.com/2012/0 ... tate_again
logic wrote:I get your point but I did say this concerning the financial part of the move:RVAparks wrote:bradyfan wrote: Worst case scenario, we go independent for three years, it doesn't work out and we go back to playing FCS football probably in a better conference than what we're in now.They aren't making these decisions with monopoly money.
Yeah no offense brady, but there is no way whatsoever that is happening. If we go FBS any time soon we're staying FBS come hell or high water.
You guys know if there would be any financial issues in doing that and if that's what keeps us from moving, fair enough. I guess I'm just getting a little antsy since we could be staring moratorium in the face for ten years.I really think if we're going to have a shot at being an FBS program, we'll do whatever it takes to get there. Whether that's accepting a bid to the WAC, doing that then becoming and independent, making a temporary move to the CAA...etc. Really though, it feels like our chances of moving up are getting slimmer by the hour. I'm to the point where it would be great to move up but I would be fine with us in the CAA for 10 years.
Purple Haize wrote:Judging by recent performance on the fied I would say we are not ready to play competitively on the FBS football level. Going to the CAA would be a great way to upgrade our talent, be competitive and better position ourselves to move to FBS. Especially if several of those schools have the same ambition.What?!?!?!? How dare you! Where is your vision
jlread wrote:Turner gill didn't come to town to play in the colonial. 1 or 2 years may pass with something like that but I can't see him sticking around if we don't go FBS as soon as we can.
Scott Bilo @Bilofootball wrote:Just met with WAC commissioner Jeff Hurd this evening. Will have an announcement in 2to 3 weeks on new football members.
Scott Bilo @Bilofootball wrote:He cannot name names, but expects to do so once school year begins. Expects to move quickly then.
Scott Bilo @Bilofootball wrote:Mentions that the additions could be for as early as 2013 season, Hurd is under confidentially agreement so cannot release any names.video
https://www.liberty.edu/news/2026/04/24/spring-202[…]