Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
thepostman wrote:it impairs your critical thinking skills which i think we are seeing the effects of that here. some of the most fun i've had is arguing the merits of legalized marijuana with my dope smoking friends ...at first they start off fine but eventually it tails off into the world of ridiculous and i get a good chuckle or too out of it.drumnColby757 wrote:Im done.. if you want to think smoking cannabis and smoking a cigarette are the same keep thinking that...have you not read my posts??? holy crap you either have some kind of martyr complex or have horrible reading comprehension or maybe you're just high. Actually that is probably it...
Again I know smoking marijuana is not nearly as bad as smoking tobacco but come on dude you are inhaling SMOKE into your lungs, that is NEVER good. That is why a lot of people have switched to doing the whole mist thing or whatever the heck they call it because you get all the benefits without inhaling smoke into your body.
but if it makes you feel better that the world is against you or maybe you are just paranoid because your high, either way get over it man and realize I am not disagreeing with you completely.
SuperJon wrote: I love dc Talk.
thepostman wrote:haha yeah its pretty clear the reading skills have been affected...And writing skills, apparently.
I honestly could care less either way...
blwall1416 wrote:normally I catch that, but that is one of the few things I do normally catch. My writing skills are awful and always have been.thepostman wrote:haha yeah its pretty clear the reading skills have been affected...And writing skills, apparently.
I honestly could care less either way...
It's "couldn't".....you couldn't care less. If you could, you would....woodchuck.
Humble_Opinion wrote:http://miami.cbslocal.com/2012/06/27/me ... ath-salts/
So the guy wasn't high on bath salts apparently as originally thought and according to the toxicology report, the only thing he had in his system was marijuana.
Dr Bruce Goldberger, director of toxicology at the University of Miami, said while the coroner's office is known for its thorough work, it would be a challenge to keep up with the pace of new formulations for synthetic drugs.
"There are many of these synthetic drugs that we currently don't have the methodology to test on, and that is not the fault of the toxicology lab," Dr Goldberger said.
"There is no one test or combination of tests that can detect every possible substance out there."
cjsweat wrote:Bleacherreport is a very legit source.
thepostman wrote:Thanks for being the d----- to point it out though, there always has to be that guy.Your panties....un-wad them.
jmdickens wrote:Actually, there's nothing in that quote that makes it untrue. The only thing they found in his system was marijuana. And as an aside, that quote is terribly misplaced in that article.Humble_Opinion wrote:http://miami.cbslocal.com/2012/06/27/me ... ath-salts/
So the guy wasn't high on bath salts apparently as originally thought and according to the toxicology report, the only thing he had in his system was marijuana.
because that isn't true. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18620868
Dr Bruce Goldberger, director of toxicology at the University of Miami, said while the coroner's office is known for its thorough work, it would be a challenge to keep up with the pace of new formulations for synthetic drugs.
"There are many of these synthetic drugs that we currently don't have the methodology to test on, and that is not the fault of the toxicology lab," Dr Goldberger said.
"There is no one test or combination of tests that can detect every possible substance out there."
blwall1416 wrote:haha panties were never in a wad, I just think its funny there is always "that guy" who has to point out grammatical errors.thepostman wrote:Thanks for being the d----- to point it out though, there always has to be that guy.Your panties....un-wad them.
Forgive me for not using a smiley face in my posting. I figured the rhyming & the use of "woodchuck" was enough to convey witty banter.
Here:
ALUmnus wrote:jmdickens wrote:Actually, there's nothing in that quote that makes it untrue. The only thing they found in his system was marijuana. And as an aside, that quote is terribly misplaced in that article.Humble_Opinion wrote:http://miami.cbslocal.com/2012/06/27/me ... ath-salts/
So the guy wasn't high on bath salts apparently as originally thought and according to the toxicology report, the only thing he had in his system was marijuana.
because that isn't true. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18620868
Dr Bruce Goldberger, director of toxicology at the University of Miami, said while the coroner's office is known for its thorough work, it would be a challenge to keep up with the pace of new formulations for synthetic drugs.
"There are many of these synthetic drugs that we currently don't have the methodology to test on, and that is not the fault of the toxicology lab," Dr Goldberger said.
"There is no one test or combination of tests that can detect every possible substance out there."
cjsweat wrote:Bleacherreport is a very legit source.
drumnColby757 wrote:it wouldnt enhance the crazy it would slow the crazy, if laced understandable thoughhttp://www.time.com/time/health/article ... 59,00.html
jbock13 wrote:I always hate it when people use this line, but I think it's true in this case that someone has a bit a vested interest in his positionhaha, its so true in this case
thepostman wrote:No, but if you are already crazy it sure doesn't help things...but I am pretty sure it was probably laced with something.i've seen some guys wired to where marijuana made them nuts. i had seen them be very aggressive and do some damage. (not this extreme mind you)
But his gf said he was such a great guy!!
SuperJon wrote: I love dc Talk.
- By Ill flame
- By ECC29
- By LU Armchair coach