Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
SuperJon wrote: I love dc Talk.
ALUmnus wrote:No.ALUmnus wrote:Wait, did LU actually endorse a candidate?
jbock13 wrote:de-facto, yes. The commercial with Gingrich just happened to hit the airwaves when he was leading in the polls.That commercial was on the airwaves months before the campaigns even started full bore. I saw them probably at least a year ago. They brought them out a little more often once Newt was rising though.
Either that's a coincidence, or it wasn't.

flamehunter wrote:jbock13 wrote:de-facto, yes. The commercial with Gingrich just happened to hit the airwaves when he was leading in the polls.That commercial was on the airwaves months before the campaigns even started full bore. I saw them probably at least a year ago. They brought them out a little more often once Newt was rising though.
Either that's a coincidence, or it wasn't.
From the class of 09 wrote: Why would a christian organization want to associate with newt in any way?
BJWilliams wrote:would it be safe to say that the only reason dickens posts these is because he hates all things conservative (and Liberty on occasion)No, but It would be safe to assume that you've wrapped up the homer of the year award for FF and it's only April
ballah09 wrote:I have no basis on this but i think Staver and his Liberty Counsel had a lot of part of Newt and Liberty. If anyone followed him on Twitter and read his Facebook (i haven't but heard), he's practically in love with Newt.+1. Right on the money.
agreed though, i wish Liberty would stay out of politics.
From the class of 09 wrote:It's the Law School - more politically conservative than Christian, IMHO.flamehunter wrote:jbock13 wrote:de-facto, yes. The commercial with Gingrich just happened to hit the airwaves when he was leading in the polls.That commercial was on the airwaves months before the campaigns even started full bore. I saw them probably at least a year ago. They brought them out a little more often once Newt was rising though.
Either that's a coincidence, or it wasn't.From the class of 09 wrote: Why would a christian organization want to associate with newt in any way?
BJWilliams wrote:would it be safe to say that the only reason dickens posts these is because he hates all things conservative (and Liberty on occasion)I am more conservative than most BJ. In fact I support the MOST conservative candidate running. I love Liberty University BJ, but that does not mean that the school can make mistakes without being called out for it. Now if you would have said I do not like Newt, you would be 100% accurate. That is because he isn't a conservative and he has no values. Period.
cjsweat wrote:Bleacherreport is a very legit source.
flamehunter wrote:I would agree with you Flamehunter, but then we would both be wrong. When I attended, it was not politically conservative, but rather theocratic conservatism. Not by the professors, no most of them were people who did not like to get involved in politics, because they realized that could lead to unemployment.
It's the Law School - more politically conservative than Christian, IMHO.
cjsweat wrote:Bleacherreport is a very legit source.
LUconn wrote:I thought LU didn't grant tenure.Could be wrong but I believe part of the accreditation process for a law school is having tenured professors so Lib has made an exception.
From the class of 09 wrote:this...yeah, some pretty distinguished professors are, so we say a little ticked by this choice.LUconn wrote:I thought LU didn't grant tenure.Could be wrong but I believe part of the accreditation process for a law school is having tenured professors so Lib has made an exception.
cjsweat wrote:Bleacherreport is a very legit source.
I hate you Merry Christmas :D :lol: May[…]