jcmanson wrote:So who are the 3 or 4 teams that have more talent than us on our schedule? I'll give you NC State and JMU. Where's the other 1 or 2?
NC State definitely. JMU could have a two to three future NFL players. Furthermore, the only reason we should have any advantage over JMU is because that game is at home. JMU certainly is more talented then we are. We might match up well with Lehigh as far as pure talent is concerned but they are much deeper than we are. Robert Morris is an interesting team and I do think we are more talented than they are. However, I think they're exteremly underrated, they beat us last year and I wouldn't be surprised if they got to us this year too.
Michigan's recruiting class might look good now but let's see what happens when they actually play. Michigan, Notre Dame and UVA for whatever reason get a ton of love from Scouts, Rivals and ESPN. I'm not sure why but they always have "good" recruiting classes. When Michigan & Notre Dame get to a decent bowl and when UVA can beat Duke, we'll talk. For now though, their recruiting classes have consisted of nothing but two stars who became five stars onced they signed with those respective schools.
Sure the SEC will lose a couple of those games. However, what I'm getting at is that 85% of their conference won't choke, at all, in any given season. Sure Miss. St. and UGA choked but UGA is quickly becoming the cupcake of the SEC. You can't take Miss. St. and UGA and tell me that the SEC isn't the premier conference in all of college football.
The point is that you can win games without talent but you'll never maximize your potential without the best players.