Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
ToTheLeft wrote:because accepting anything less than the best is, as Vanilla Ice would say, a felony
BJWilliams wrote:I think highly of the guy just because he is more of a man than most of you jackwagons

ToTheLeft wrote:because accepting anything less than the best is, as Vanilla Ice would say, a felony
BJWilliams wrote:I think highly of the guy just because he is more of a man than most of you jackwagons
Chris Lang wrote:Liberty has no gripe. 0-7 against the Top 50. Lost two of three to a bad Winthrop team at the end of the season. I think that killed the Flames even more than the 0-7.so close, guys. Elon (RPI 49) got in, I guess the committee thought your RPI of 45 "not good enough?". Maybe just one more win over Winthrop earlier would have done it. Or, if you all had swept UNCA earlier (I bet the committee saw that, too).
kdinva wrote:We played Elon home and away and they beat us twice. Unfortunately, the title of this thread is on target.Chris Lang wrote:Liberty has no gripe. 0-7 against the Top 50. Lost two of three to a bad Winthrop team at the end of the season. I think that killed the Flames even more than the 0-7.so close, guys. Elon (RPI 49) got in, I guess the committee thought your RPI of 45 "not good enough?". Maybe just one more win over Winthrop earlier would have done it. Or, if you all had swept UNCA earlier (I bet the committee saw that, too).
Still a tip of the cap for the 42 wins, etc.
jenkins wrote:4 reasons we were left out
-losing home and away to Elon, a team that we battled for the last spots
-swept by Duke, a lower tier ACC team that we needed to split with at least
-Bullpen blowing big leads that cost us sweeps of manhattan and SJU
-losing the winthrop and UNCA series
I guarantee you that if we beat Elon once, Duke once, hold the lead against Manhattand and SJU and the winthrop and UNCA series we are in as 3.
The argument of not beating coastal and VT is faulty and if you listened to the selection show you heard them discuss this topic in depth regarding GT and then it's discussed again on several other sites. We simply allowed them too many reasons to leave us out. We could've went 0 and 5 against VT and Coastal and still got in with ease had we not blew so many leads.
I know those are a big if but if you re-call each of those games, we should have won them and had we had a strong bullpen early the year we would've won those games and probably the high point game as well.
Either way I agree that we were one of the last times out and that is about right. It gives us the tape measure for what we need to do in the future and shows that can't have a delaware state on our schedule and probably need to pick up one more series a year against a top 25 caliber team.
ToTheLeft wrote:because accepting anything less than the best is, as Vanilla Ice would say, a felony
BJWilliams wrote:I think highly of the guy just because he is more of a man than most of you jackwagons
Chris Lang wrote:New Mexico won a series at Texas. That was a big factor.Sly, have you hacked into Lang's computer?
El Scorcho wrote:post at your own risk.
jcmanson wrote:I don't know why anybody got their hopes up. We had Zero chance of making it. I didn't even watch the selection show.+1
BJWilliams wrote:No we arent talking about keeping it on the "down low", we are moving now to the boys who simply are tasked with stopping the OTHER team from scoring,
jcmanson wrote:I don't know why anybody got their hopes up. We had Zero chance of making it. I didn't even watch the selection show.I wanted to see where Coastal would go. I knew they had a shot for something high but getting #4 was crazy.