- March 29th, 2010, 5:01 pm
#304216
Wow... that's so ignorant man. There's no facts or anything to support what you've said.
Duke, in UK's position, would have played a 16, 9 seed Wake (Hmmm, I think we've had that game played before... 20 point win for Duke in the Regular season), 12 seed Cornell (Could have been a decent game, but I don't think the Big Red could beat Duke. If you want to call this a loss, I can't completely refute it, but I simply don't think Duke would have lost to Cornell), and 2 seed WVU. If Duke beats WVU to make it to the final, then you CANNOT say that...
A) Duke doesn't belong in the Final.
B) Kentucky could have made it in over Duke, since Duke BEAT THE TEAM that UK LOST TO.
If WVU wins, then your point maybe has a tiny little grain of truth. But even still, it's a ridiculous point. I think Baylor gives UK a serious run for their money, they were probably in the top 4 most athletic teams in the tourney and could have kept up with UK easily, even your boy John Wall.
Duke, in UK's position, would have played a 16, 9 seed Wake (Hmmm, I think we've had that game played before... 20 point win for Duke in the Regular season), 12 seed Cornell (Could have been a decent game, but I don't think the Big Red could beat Duke. If you want to call this a loss, I can't completely refute it, but I simply don't think Duke would have lost to Cornell), and 2 seed WVU. If Duke beats WVU to make it to the final, then you CANNOT say that...
A) Duke doesn't belong in the Final.
B) Kentucky could have made it in over Duke, since Duke BEAT THE TEAM that UK LOST TO.
If WVU wins, then your point maybe has a tiny little grain of truth. But even still, it's a ridiculous point. I think Baylor gives UK a serious run for their money, they were probably in the top 4 most athletic teams in the tourney and could have kept up with UK easily, even your boy John Wall.
It was my privilege to serve you today. If you have any feedback, please direct it to my Assistant Director....