- November 8th, 2009, 4:09 pm
#283712
After writing my letter very sincerely to the Big South, I’ve experienced an epiphany:
Yesterday’s CCU/G-W game turned into a nice one, with a late score for the win. Even going into the season, when these TV schedules are made, that’s a pretty appealing match-up. One could argue just as appealing as LU/VMI, if not more so.
So why couldn’t the conference have selected CCU/GW as its game of the week at 3:30, then allowed LU to produce its own game at 7:00 – also televised on MASN – and secured a Big South doubleheader on the network…all for the cost of producing only one game?!
Sort of, buy one-get one free, TV production style! If the conference had the opporutnity to do this, and neglected ot notice, or knowingly decided against it, I'd love to know their logic.
Ps – maybe MASN restricted them from doing this, in which case blame shifts back to being equally shared by both the BSC and MASN.
Yesterday’s CCU/G-W game turned into a nice one, with a late score for the win. Even going into the season, when these TV schedules are made, that’s a pretty appealing match-up. One could argue just as appealing as LU/VMI, if not more so.
So why couldn’t the conference have selected CCU/GW as its game of the week at 3:30, then allowed LU to produce its own game at 7:00 – also televised on MASN – and secured a Big South doubleheader on the network…all for the cost of producing only one game?!
Sort of, buy one-get one free, TV production style! If the conference had the opporutnity to do this, and neglected ot notice, or knowingly decided against it, I'd love to know their logic.
Ps – maybe MASN restricted them from doing this, in which case blame shifts back to being equally shared by both the BSC and MASN.








- By thecomeback
- By jmclaughlin