Welcome to construction! Most new homes have a lot of similar quirks. You just have to have the contractors fix them as you notice them.
I have to respectfully diasgree, quality construction doesn't have glaring mistakes and shortcuts like those mentioned. You may have some minor issues, a door hinge needs tweaking, an edge here or there needs to be sanded, etc. Let's just admit that under the circumstances they were willing to sacrifice some of the quality in order to have them done in time. In light of some of the observations made by students over the last couple of years concerning the workmanship, I suppose the mentality is build them so they are somewhat functional now, and then down the road go back in and retrofit.
Being in the growing pains they are in a sort of catch 22 since they don't have the billion dollar endowment up and running yet with its yearly interest yield, so it is more of a zero sum game now: they need the students' tuition to pay the bills so they can build, but more students mean you've got to have a place for them to be. I would imagine that if they succeed in raising the endowment and have the right people managing the investment portfolio, they would begin to go back and remodel the inside to more exacting standards with some of the interest yield. If the dorms are structurally sound, then going back in and remodeling them in the future after they reach their stated goals would be feasable and most likely warranted after 5-10 years of living wear and tear anyways.
Regardless, they do look sharp from the outside (of course, when I was there we had the one floor 70's style architecture DeMoss.)