Sly Fox wrote: Anybody on here who knows any of the voters knows what I am talking about.You have got to be kidding me. Dude, how much average weight do you lose in a day just from dropping names?
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
Sly Fox wrote: Anybody on here who knows any of the voters knows what I am talking about.You have got to be kidding me. Dude, how much average weight do you lose in a day just from dropping names?

RagingTireFire wrote:Sly Fox wrote: Anybody on here who knows any of the voters knows what I am talking about.You have got to be kidding me. Dude, how much average weight do you lose in a day just from dropping names?
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
whmatthews wrote:Smoltz goes to Cooperstownfor no other reason that he's a beast on the mound and that he's had a sweet beard and the horseshoe hairdo for most of his career. I love Smoltzie, he's pitched in about 4 or 5 Braves games I've been to and each time they've won.Andruw Jones is on the wrong side of 30 to get back on track... let alone have another "5-10 years" like he did in 2006.
And Chipper goes too, no doubt, homerun number 400.
And if Andruw Jones could get back on track and have another good 5-10 years like he did before this and last season, I would make the case that he should go too.
bigsmooth wrote:smoltz is a hall of famer though im not sure of the first ballot though. this certainly hurts for this season's prospects as well thought the NL east is pretty balanced other than the nats.Like Tim K on ESPN said...either you are a HOFer or you're not. Smoltz is without a doubt.
Fumblerooskies wrote:Problem is, I disagree with the "either you are or are not" attitude. To separate people into such binary labels is a little off, because there are Hall of Famers and then there are the uber-elite. I think the most easiest way to determine if someone is sponge-worthy enough to be uber-elite is to say that they are first-ballot or not.bigsmooth wrote:smoltz is a hall of famer though im not sure of the first ballot though. this certainly hurts for this season's prospects as well thought the NL east is pretty balanced other than the nats.Like Tim K on ESPN said...either you are a HOFer or you're not. Smoltz is without a doubt.
ToTheLeft wrote:And the consensus from guys like Stark, Gammons, Olney, etc, seems to be that "If Chipper wasn't clean, no one was clean." His stats were never THAT inflated. Pretty consistent.And most likely against inflated competition. I mean come on 19 games a year vs the Mets? Yep
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
Sly Fox wrote:Chipper's inflated numbers from the juicing era make him far from a lock.Are you serious? You can't be. There's no way you're that ignorant. Do you watch the game of baseball? Have you kept up with Chipper Jones at all? Chipper's numbers and the obvious fact that he wasn't on steroids make him playing in the juicing era that much more impressive. He's playing better now after all of the juicing is out of the game (for the most part) than he did during the juicing era. He's one of the top three (arguably top two) switch hitters ever to play the game. Not to mention he was able to switch positions at the prime of his career and play in the outfield, and then move back to third base. He even played some first base in there if I'm not mistaken, and a few games at shortstop. He's easily a Hall of Famer.