- October 25th, 2007, 8:52 am
#121481
Answer me this:
I have the right to free speech. If I am out on the street, I can say whatever I want, with certain, but very few, exceptions (obviously can't create a panic for no reason, stuff like that). If I'm on that same street I could do that with a megaphone, reaching more people. As long as I'm not breaking volume ordinances, of course. But if somebody swaps that out to a a mic that is broadcasting to radios everywhere, suddenly the government can restrict it. How do they have this power? What makes broadcasting on airwaves different than broadcasting with my voice, in the government restriction sense? I'm sure this was covered in Comms 102 or something.
I have the right to free speech. If I am out on the street, I can say whatever I want, with certain, but very few, exceptions (obviously can't create a panic for no reason, stuff like that). If I'm on that same street I could do that with a megaphone, reaching more people. As long as I'm not breaking volume ordinances, of course. But if somebody swaps that out to a a mic that is broadcasting to radios everywhere, suddenly the government can restrict it. How do they have this power? What makes broadcasting on airwaves different than broadcasting with my voice, in the government restriction sense? I'm sure this was covered in Comms 102 or something.
*please disregard this post if dated before 2017 and accept my apologies*




- By AATL
- By LU Armchair coach