El Scorcho wrote:That's not at all true. Just because we've accepted non-Christians doesn't have any bearing on how we run the school. Even if we know there are non-Christians here, is everything designed for helping Christian students grow, or do we primarily focus on evangelizing? Just because they're here doesn't make the underlying philosophical question go away.
if you allow Muslims then you aren't for Christians. to be for Christians, in my opinion, means only for Christians. Like the LLWS is only for kids of a certain age, the NFL is only for people three years removed from their HS graduation, etc. by allowing an atheist, a muslim, an agnostic etc., that says to me that you aren't just for Christians. it doesn't mean that the school isnt designed for Christians (because it obviously is), it just means that makming it open to others means it isnt exclusively for Christians. by allowing others in, it makes it clear that LU is an option for people not of the Christian faith. If I were an atheist and I applied and were accepted to LU, that would mean that Liberty is for me, if LU is not for me then I should not have been accepted.
that leaves you with the only other choice of being a Christian University, which to me simply means you are a university founded and based on the Christian faith, which doesn't mean to me that you are a university exclusively for Christians.