[SuperJon]

Bump.

[LUGrad2000]

Yes he is the man for the job.

[Purple Haize]

Yes. Stupid question

[jmmiii]

Yes. But, staff changes on special teams. Maybe also OL, and secondary. Finally, I get the sense that this staff badly needs a "details guy" and doesn't have one.

[LUnpretty11]

Bump.

You have never been more wrong on a subject than the agenda you are pushing right now. It's an emotional response to a very VERY poor season. This isn't typical Liberty - I get the catchphrase after SIU loss - but not this. This is something different and something worse. The players have quit, not the coaches.

[thepostman]

I believe he is the man for the job but I can understand why some would feel differently

[JK37]

IF the players have quit, do the coaches bear no responsibility for that?

[Purple Haize]

IF the players have quit, do the coaches bear no responsibility for that?

Not at this point.

[SuperJon]

That wasn't what this board was saying when players "quit" on Layer.

[adam42381]

He is the man for the job at Liberty which means he'll never win the big one. It is what it is.

[Purple Haize]

That wasn't what this board was saying when players "quit" on Layer.

Because it was an annual occurance

Plus there were on court issues

[NotAJerry]

I came around to Gill being the guy with the run at the end of last season. He's making me want to go back to my original position of him being a career loser before he was hired. Great guy, hopefully he can get it figured out quickly.

[SuperJon]

That wasn't what this board was saying when players "quit" on Layer.

Because it was an annual occurance

Plus there were on court issues

And there aren't on field issues?

[Chippy]

He is the man for the job at Liberty which means he'll never win the big one. It is what it is.

Gill is the right guy for this university - no doubt.

Can't win if you can't run. Coastal's last 4 years have been great - 2 years with Lorenzo Taliaferro and 2 with DeAngelo Henderson. Makes their QB look good.

[SuperJon]

So who's fault is it that we don't have a run game?

[thepostman]

BJs

[flamesfilmguy]

I'll be willing to give him next season. if the same thing occurs again I think it might be time to cut the cord. if we lose to Kennesaw State at homecoming... Cut it monday morning.

[SuperJon]

I'll be willing to give him next season. if the same thing occurs again I think it might be time to cut the cord. if we lose to Kennesaw State at homecoming... Cut it monday morning.

This was the year though. Next year we have a new QB, lose our all-time WR, and replace both running backs.

If he can't do it with those guys as seniors, what makes us think he can do it with younger guys?

[JK37]

Why can't it be done with those guys as seniors?

[thepostman]

I'll be willing to give him next season. if the same thing occurs again I think it might be time to cut the cord. if we lose to Kennesaw State at homecoming... Cut it monday morning.

I agree with this.

[SuperJon]

But why?

If next year is a rebuilding year, why are we going to judge if he's our guy on a rebuilding year?

Why not cut our losses and let the guy who we trust to lead us in the future lead the rebuild?

[thepostman]

That wasn't what this board was saying when players "quit" on Layer.

We have not even come close to dale layer level of failure. You're an emotional wreck right now. Or just trolling.

[thepostman]

But why?

If next year is a rebuilding year, why are we going to judge if he's our guy on a rebuilding year?

Why not cut our losses and let the guy who we trust to lead us in the future lead the rebuild?

Because this is the first time in his tenure I have felt like a team quit on him. If it continues than cut him lose.

[SuperJon]

But then we're another year or two behind. It's basketball after the NCAA tourney run all over.

[thepostman]

No it is not. Our win percentage was awful during layers entire tenure. To compare the two is ridiculous.