
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke, Class of 20Something
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
northernslider wrote:You have got to be kidding me. You are saying that school loyality is purely judged by the color of of your clothes you wear to a game? What would the AD rather see, empty stands midway thru the 3rd qtr or stands full of students dressed in what ever color till the end of the game.thanks man! this thread was getting dull!
Isaiah 11:3 - and he will delight in the fear of the LORD. He will not judge by what he sees with his eyes, or decide by what he hears with his ears;
If God can look past the clothes then certainly the AD can.
Matthew 15:11
What goes into a man's mouth does not make him 'unclean,' but what comes out of his mouth, that is what makes him 'unclean.' "

Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.

olldflame wrote:My first comment is that I saw the girls in dresses and wondered what was going on, but then later, from the Baptist side, I didn't think they made any significant difference in the "sea of red".Best post on this thread, aside from SJ trying to make people understand what he actually was SAYING and not what they were hearing him say.
Personally, I don't have a problem with appropriate non-conformity in the LU student body, and in their support for the team. It takes all forms, and I agree with those who commend these kids for their attendance and enthusiastic participation. I went to Lynchburg Baptist College at a time when there was not much tolerence for individuality, and I think we have made great strides in this area.
My problem is with the way they chose to do it. First of all, khakis, polo shirts and sun dresses is not "dressing up, and is not really representative of "southern style". It is representative of only a tiny segment of frat boy/sororiety girl culture on a few campuses. Sort of a snooty "I'm better than you crowd". When I think of Khakis and polos I think of the rich real estate guy from Charleston who flips houses on one of those cable shows. What is more disturbing though is that on the campuses they are "copying" (and let's face it, that's what is happening here) the crowd that takes on this psuedo-southern-style affectation is generally the biggest bunch of boozers on campus, and whether our LU group is copying that or not, that is the association that is made. I commend the enthusiasm of this group, but IMHO it is misguided.
Sly Fox wrote:I'm just glad to see a mutual understanding has been met. Congrats to both sides for recognizing the other's position and then reaching a common ground.
givemethemic wrote:If you really had a problem with him couldn't have just done it privately? I know you feel like you are the number 1 cheerleader and that's great but I swear sometiimes you make a freaking mountian out of a molehill!!!! You don't need to remind me how far we have come... Until 3 weeks ago I have been around LU my whole life...so trust me I know how far we have come... I just think you made a way to big a deal out of this...i know you meant well...but by telling him not to do this publicly you opened yourself up to this...shouldn't you have done this privately!!?? come on man!!

Hold My Own wrote:I called them yuppies! And when half of them came in today I called them that again! In fact I think they are going to wear white shirts spelling it out next game....which I think would be "halarryous"I love you, T
givemethemic wrote:haha... maybe I have been drinking some of the same stuff they had before the game......kiddiing...