- November 17th, 2015, 11:02 am
#498641
its only relevant from the standpoint of that is how the starter was aptly named going into this year. Most of the time its usually that both get the same plays called for them and its who does better with those plays. I am not sure if it was based off of pass protection or what, but whatever it was the running game hasn't been the same, but I am going to try and put an end to this right now with this actual factual numbers. Its obvious to me the tried feeding the ball to 26 more and in fact it seems that 2 did more with less attempts.
RUSHING No. Gain Loss Net TD Lg Avg.
RICE, Desmond 20 145 6 139 2 27 6.9 Delaware St
ABNAR, D.J. 13 89 9 80 0 24 6.2
RUSHING No. Gain Loss Net TD Lg Avg.
RICE, Desmond 11 47 10 37 0 29 3.4
MACON, Todd 8 31 0 31 1 7 3.9 WVA
ABNAR, D.J. 5 16 0 16 0 5 3.2
RUSHING No. Gain Loss Net TD Lg Avg.
ABNAR, D.J. 8 58 0 58 1 40 7.2
RICE, Desmond 20 56 7 49 0 8 2.5 Montana
RUSHING No. Gain Loss Net TD Lg Avg.
MACON, Todd 10 30 2 28 1 6 2.8
ABNAR, D.J 7 27 3 24 0 9 3.4 Southern Illinois
RICE, Desmond 12 23 1 22 0 5 1.8
RUSHING No. Gain Loss Net TD Lg Avg.
ABNAR, D.J. 10 90 2 88 0 67 8.8
RICE, Desmond 22 90 3 87 3 23 4.0 Georgia St.
Do I need to continue Sir, so if this doesn't help put in your mind that there was some Loyalty over production, then sir we will just have to agree to disagree, the proof is in the PRODUCTION. Less carries, Less LOST yardage and a better Avg. And to boot he was hurt in a cpl games which gave Macon a few more carries.
