jbock13 wrote:Agree with you Humble.
Et tu JB? Et tu? This is not the thread. You have betrayed theOneTrue Thread
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
jbock13 wrote:Agree with you Humble.
Humble_Opinion wrote:of course he will but its still total sleezeball move.RubberMallet wrote:what kind of abag holds 5 million dollars to charities hostage unless he gets this that and the other?Come onnnn you know he's going to give it regardless. It is almost tax season after all.
belcherboy wrote:http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/201 ... ctoral-mapgood ole huff post..thats a serious landslide defeat..I think Romney wins it..wishful thinking but dont think we can take another 4 years..well at least I cant
I can't wait to compare this to the actual results later this week.
belcherboy wrote:http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/201 ... ctoral-maphaha, OH was moved from a toss up to Obama leaning, and NC was moved from Romney lean to toss up. That is a joke.
I can't wait to compare this to the actual results later this week.
LUconn wrote:Does anybody really think the hurricane gave Obama a boost? That just doesn't make any sense.Does it surprise you? Honestly? There are people that believe the storm was government created to help one candidate over the other; with both sides saying the other candidate produced it.
TH Spangler wrote:Megyn Kelly just reported that Larry Sabato says Obama wins.
http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crysta ... cond-term/
4everfsu wrote:I'm still surprised that anyone takes the Colorado method seriously as it has never predicted anything. Let's see it get something right, instead of just having past info entered in, before trusting it too much. It may prove to work, but it's never been put to the test.TH Spangler wrote:Megyn Kelly just reported that Larry Sabato says Obama wins.
http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crysta ... cond-term/
I will take the track records of the two college professors from U of Colorado prediction based off their economic model vs Larry Sabato.
NotAJerry wrote:Their predictions have been accurate in every presidential election since 1980.4everfsu wrote:I'm still surprised that anyone takes the Colorado method seriously as it has never predicted anything. Let's see it get something right, instead of just having past info entered in, before trusting it too much. It may prove to work, but it's never been put to the test.TH Spangler wrote:Megyn Kelly just reported that Larry Sabato says Obama wins.
http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crysta ... cond-term/
I will take the track records of the two college professors from U of Colorado prediction based off their economic model vs Larry Sabato.
With a slight, unexpected lift provided by Hurricane Sandy, Mother Nature’s October surprise, President Barack Obama appears poised to win his second term tomorrow.The fact that Sabato's prediction starts off with that line tells me everything I need to know about him and what he thinks about the electorate. To use that as the justification as to why Obama wins is stupid. If a person hasn't made up their mind by this point and they are able to be swayed by such an event as 'Sandy', then they likely won't even show up to vote tomorrow anyways, and if they were they were probably leaning Obama anyways. Besides the press out of the area has not been all that stellar for the Federal Government at this point. I suppose the photo-op with Christy was good for Obama, but I don't think that would actually change anyones votes anywhere.
4everfsu wrote:Amazing feat for something that has existed for just a few years. They've NEVER PREDICTED an election beforehand, they've simply entered past information and tried to find the common themes to make a prediction this time around.
Their predictions have been accurate in every presidential election since 1980.
http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/23/unive ... omney-win/