This is the location for conversations that don't fall anywhere else on FlameFans. Whether its politics, culture, the latest techno stuff or just the best places to travel on the web ... this is your forum.

Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke

User avatar
By whmatthews
Registration Days Posts
#181166
Surprise, surprise.

http://news.aol.com/elections/story/_a/ ... 1200172348

Historians See Little Chance for McCain
By David Paul Kuhn,Politico.com
Posted: 2008-06-15 20:02:08
(June 15) - One week into the general election, the polls show a dead heat. But many presidential scholars doubt that John McCain stands much of a chance, if any.

Historians belonging to both parties offered a litany of historical comparisons that give little hope to the Republican. Several saw Barack Obama’s prospects as the most promising for a Democrat since Roosevelt trounced Hoover in 1932.

“This should be an overwhelming Democratic victory,” said Allan Lichtman, an American University presidential historian who ran in a Maryland Democratic senatorial primary in 2006. Lichtman, whose forecasting model has correctly predicted the last six presidential popular vote winners, predicts that this year, “Republicans face what have always been insurmountable historical odds.” His system gives McCain a score on par with Jimmy Carter’s in 1980.

“McCain shouldn’t win it,” said presidential historian Joan Hoff, a professor at Montana State University and former president of the Center for the Study of the Presidency. She compared McCain’s prospects to those of Hubert Humphrey, whose 1968 loss to Richard Nixon resulted in large part from the unpopularity of sitting Democratic president Lyndon Johnson.
By jmdickens
Registration Days Posts
#181181
well duh......are country is full of idiots who will vote for him.

Also, poor people
By LUconn
Registration Days Posts
#181192
oxymoron -
ox·y·mo·ron

noun
conjoining contradictory terms
User avatar
By RagingTireFire
Registration Days Posts
#181214
Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't historians vastly more qualified to discuss past events. I mean, that's pretty much the entire job description.
By jmdickens
Registration Days Posts
#181389
RagingTireFire wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't historians vastly more qualified to discuss past events. I mean, that's pretty much the entire job description.
bamf
User avatar
By adam42381
Registration Days Posts
#181398
jmdickens wrote:well duh......are country is full of idiots who will vote for him.

Also, poor people
I find it funny that you would begin a sentence about idiots with "are country".
User avatar
By RagingTireFire
Registration Days Posts
#181419
jmdickens wrote:bamf
Taking up teleportation there, dickens?
By Hold My Own
Registration Days Posts
#181423
jmdickens wrote:Also, poor people
Image




my favorite though is Charles Barkley...he summed it up good

"Poor People have been voting for Democrats for the last 50 years, and they are still poor."
By Ed Dantes
Registration Days Posts
#181494
You don't have to have a liberal bias to say that Obama is going to win, just common sense.
User avatar
By Cider Jim
Registration Days Posts
#181503
Hold My Own wrote:"Poor People have been voting for Democrats for the last 50 years, and they are still poor."
Which includes the whole state of West Virginia.
User avatar
By mrmacphisto
Registration Days Posts
#181538
Ed Dantes wrote:You don't have to have a liberal bias to say that Obama is going to win, just common sense.
:nod
25/26 Season

Ah, the continuous Middle School frat boys are at […]

Chadwell’s Health

Fair point. None of us are on the inside, but comm[…]

Sam Houston 1/10 3:30 EST

We did not play particularly well and Sammy shot m[…]

Transfer Portal Reaction

That’s fair, and no one’s dismissing h[…]