- March 21st, 2012, 12:52 pm
#385767
Practically one minute before Tebow was traded, Sean Peyton was suspended for an entire year. As with Tebow, will provide source when avail.
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
LUnpretty11 wrote:PH, your BJ skills impress me.
adam42381 wrote: I guarantee that there won't be bounty systems anymore.Yeah there will.
El Scorcho wrote:post at your own risk.
jcmanson wrote:I wasn't referencing incentives between players. This is about coaches who either implemented the bounty systems or were responsible to know what assistants were doing. I'm sure players will still find a way to keep themselves motivated. It's much different when the organization is behind it.adam42381 wrote: I guarantee that there won't be bounty systems anymore.Yeah there will.
Just will be more hush-hush and no coaches will be involved or aware.
LUnpretty11 wrote:PH, your BJ skills impress me.
adam42381 wrote:I wasn't referencing incentives between players. This is about coaches who either implemented the bounty systems or were responsible to know what assistants were doing. I'm sure players will still find a way to keep themselves motivated. It's much different when the organization is behind it.agreed
El Scorcho wrote:post at your own risk.
adam42381 wrote:I'm shocked that the suspension was that long, but I think it shows that they really are serious about player safety covering their rears in future lawsuits.
jcmanson wrote:You mean, "involved or aware". Not going to stop the good ole boy coaches from the bounty circus, especially the ones who were involved in it as players.adam42381 wrote: I guarantee that there won't be bounty systems anymore.Yeah there will.
Just will be more hush-hush and no coaches will be involved or aware.
adam42381 wrote:the problem here wasn't that there was a bounty system, there is plenty of evidence that this has been going on across the nfl for years. the problem goodell had is not that they were involved, but that there was a frikking paper trail, which has the potential to indict the nfl in any type of potential injury suit. the also big issue was the fact that outside money became involved. when your bounty program is funded and recorded as being funded by outside individuals or groups of individuals, you are asking for trouble. they didn't get hammered for this when they first got caught back when even, it was a "hey cut that out". when you get arrogant about it and don't listen to the commishoner, you get the hammer.jcmanson wrote:I wasn't referencing incentives between players. This is about coaches who either implemented the bounty systems or were responsible to know what assistants were doing. I'm sure players will still find a way to keep themselves motivated. It's much different when the organization is behind it.adam42381 wrote: I guarantee that there won't be bounty systems anymore.Yeah there will.
Just will be more hush-hush and no coaches will be involved or aware.
SuperJon wrote: I love dc Talk.
lynchburgwildcats wrote:I hadn't really followed the situation closely, but outside money was involved? That has to be criminally illegal to some extent and sets up the NFL for loads of potential court expenses. No wonder the punishments were as harsh as they were.Exactly.
SuperJon wrote: I love dc Talk.