Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
Rooster Cogburn wrote:Nope, they were both better and Sam admitted as much himself. Prior to his injury, Goodman was one of the best pure runners I've ever seen. Sam struggled with zone blocking schemes and ball security. He had a pro-style body and speed which helped him get to the league but those same problems surfaced again when he was with Houston.LUconn wrote:Barnes and Goodman were better. They just didn't have NFL bodies.Not better just different runners. Should have been used in a big / small rotation.
SuperJon wrote:I wasn't here but I spent the past two and a half years around people that were so I've got a pretty good idea what I was talking about.Yeah speaking of people you talk fondly about KK, tell Lib i said HI. For each example you give on "talent" i can give you 2 people who were complete busts or Karcher mismanged there career to the point that they left. When you can name 4 Qb's of KK's off the top on your head that were awful and KK was a QB himself and a QB coach, thats laughable. IF you can't recognize talent at the position that you played, thats just an embarrassment.
If he didn't know talent, tell me why Eugene Goodman, Dre Barnes, Manny Rojas, Nick Hursky, Ryan Greiser Pat Calvary, Mike Godsil, Colin Dugan, etc were here. He had no clue what to do with that talent or how to relate to that talent, but he got them here. A lot of that had to do with his assistants (as does every staff) but ultimately the head coach gets credit/blame for recruits. He got some talent here. He just couldn't do anything with it.
Libertine wrote:Last statement on KK...when you say early in your career that your making a difference in the locker room to deflect the fact that you just lost by 60 + points in multiple weeks - not inspriing. Not to mention after a game he couldn't even comment on any play " until he saw the film" - ugh im done.Rooster Cogburn wrote:As for Karcher, he was a successful coach at every level until he was the head coach at Liberty. You could argue any number of reasons why he wasn't a winner here and most of them would be at least a little bit valid but it's not like he was just some yokel that fell off a truck on the way down 460.LUconn wrote:Barnes and Goodman were better. They just didn't have NFL bodies.Not better just different runners. Should have been used in a big / small rotation.
Moving on to Rashad, bear in mind that Rashad coming out of LCA was a completely different player from the guy who transferred from Pitt and was practically an entirely different person from the guy who just got drafted. He was big and fast but not quick. He was purely a power runner who couldn't consistently make cuts and wouldn't really learn that skill until his junior season. Karcher's system was essentially the Shanahan Denver Broncos system which relied on the RB reading the OL to figure out where the hole was going to be and making a cut to get there. LCA Rashad would not have been successful doing that.
Comparing Rashad to Dre or Eugene is comparing apples to spaghetti. Dre was a Brian Westbrook-type back who had talent enough to make it but didn't have enough size to survive a Big South season let the NFL. Eugene was a physical freak who was as fast as Rashad, was physically stronger and hit the hole harder than Rashad but was a less versatile player. If not for that G-W cheap shot in '04, he would have been the most likely of the Dre/Gene/Sam trio to make it to the next level.
Rocketfan wrote:Look again. I said Rashad was fast but not quick. His game at LCA was running over people pure and simple. I remember one game where he went for something like 210 yards but it took him 42 carries to get it.Libertine wrote: He was big and fast but not quick.You say Rashad was quick but not fast ( and yes i understand that the teams that LCA played were not off the charts good) but i never saw him once get caught from behind *in the open field*.
Comparing Dre Barnes to Westbrook is not accurate either. Westbrook doesn't get run down from behind and Dre did. Id be shocked also if Goodman could lift more ( or is physically stronger than Rashad ). That would have to be close. The 04 cheap shot still haunts me for Goodman, man what could have been...
Libertine wrote:Comparing Rashad to Dre or Eugene is comparing apples to spaghetti.Apple flavored Spagetti. I always say apples to Giraffes.
Libertine wrote: If you believe that anyone inside or outside the program (but especially inside the program) "remembers the Karcher Era fondly", especially now, then you don't really know what the Karcher Era was actually like.You loved that spiky-haired Frankenstein and you know it. You've probably got a Fathead version of this on your bedroom wall.
Libertine wrote:We broke up. He got the kids and I got two rings.Your new love got you the 2 rings. I hope that relationship lasts much longer. I don't wanna see that split unless it is just you leaving!
Libertine wrote:We broke up. He got the kids and I got two rings.Got to give you an obligatory "Oh, snap!" on that one. Excuse me while I cover my hand with my mouth and fall backward like a 12-year old on a schoolbus.
RagingTireFire wrote:Oh you two.Libertine wrote:We broke up. He got the kids and I got two rings.Got to give you an obligatory "Oh, snap!" on that one. Excuse me while I cover my hand with my mouth and fall backward like a 12-year old on a schoolbus.
Check your PM.
Running Back: After a big contract Maurice Jones-Drew is in the spotlight. The Jags decided to invest in the younger Drew and let long time starter Fred Taylor sign with the Patriots. Drew is a solid starter as the Bronco D can attest when Drew had his season high 125yds and 2 td’s against them in October. With the 250th pick the Jags feel they got a steal in Rashad Jennings who some had rated as a 2nd round talent. Jennings should help spell Drew this season. Hold over’s Chauncey Washington and DD Terry should provide depth.http://www.milehighreport.com/2009/5/14 ... le-jaguars
The word coming out of OTAs is that Jennings has been very impressive. Jaguars.com writer Vic Ketchman wrote the rookie RB from Liberty "has been eye-popping so far this spring."http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1831 ... -mjd-at-rb
Having had a chance to watch some film on Jennings, he looks like a tough runner with good field vision and decent speed when he gets through the hole.
It's hard to tell how much of his ability was magnified by the fact that he played against lesser competition. But don't be surprised if the 6' 1", 234-pound back emerges as the No. 2 guy.
Running back Rashad Jennings was such a good pick for Jacksonville. I'm so high on this guy. He brings in power to compliment the small, quick Maurice Jones-Drew. I projected him to be picked in the late 2nd or early 3rd round, but he fell because he played at Liberty. Don't be surprised if Jennings is this years break out rookie.
Rooster Cogburn wrote:http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1955 ... le-jaguarsRunning back Rashad Jennings was such a good pick for Jacksonville. I'm so high on this guy. He brings in power to compliment the small, quick Maurice Jones-Drew. I projected him to be picked in the late 2nd or early 3rd round, but he fell because he played at Liberty. Don't be surprised if Jennings is this years break out rookie.
LUconn wrote:Bleacher Report is a terrible place for sports information. It's stuff written by fans. I used to follow the Bengals guy on twitter but his articles were always the same sarcastic pessimism.First mistake = Bengals fan